Skip to main content

Security report for traveltime.lv

TravelTime.lv · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TravelTime.lv is a Latvian travel and tourism blog providing curated travel packages, tips, and information about tour operators. The website targets Latvian-speaking travelers interested in both local and international destinations. It operates on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools, including Yoast SEO and Google Analytics. The site uses HTTPS and integrates advertising via Google Adsense and OneSignal push notifications. However, it lacks some privacy compliance features such as cookie consent and explicit GDPR indicators. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is professionally designed with good content quality and moderate technical maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching traveltime.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
55
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as an informational platform aggregating travel offers and providing travel advice, likely monetized through advertising and partnerships with travel agencies. It occupies a niche position in the Latvian travel market, appealing to leisure travelers and tourists. The business model focuses on content marketing and affiliate-like relationships with tour operators. The site demonstrates consistent branding and content relevance but lacks explicit business registration or certification disclosures. Its partnership ecosystem includes travel agencies and theme developers but no direct payment or e-commerce integrations are evident.

Security posture

The site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. It uses reputable third-party services for analytics and push notifications. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, and no security policy is visible. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms also indicates partial GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard web security best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and explicit GDPR compliance information to improve privacy adherence.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact details to increase transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Attempt to retrieve and publish WHOIS and business registration data to improve legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TravelTime.lv
Description
Tavs ceļojumu un tūrisma emuārs, kas apkopo labākos un uzticamākos tūroperatoru piedāvājumus, piedāvājot ceļojumu idejas, padomus ceļotājiem un informāciju par ceļojumu aģentūrām.
Key services
Travel blog content, Tour operator offers aggregation, Travel tips and advice, Tour agency information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Google Analytics, OneSignal Web Push, Advanced Ads plugin, Font Awesome 6
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of OneSignal with service worker configured

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Marketing tools
OneSignal Web Push
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian travel blog with multiple recent posts about travel destinations and tips.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with good use of structured data and SEO metadata.
  3. No contact phone numbers or social media links explicitly found; only email contact implied via images and text.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit GDPR compliance mechanisms detected.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no domain registration details extracted.
  6. Uses HTTPS and modern web technologies including WordPress and Google Analytics.
  7. Advertising is present via Google Adsense and OneSignal push notifications.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a custom Blossom Spa theme and uses popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and Advanced Ads. It loads jQuery and other JavaScript libraries for UI and analytics. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social media integration. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but provides basic semantic markup and navigation clarity. There is room for technical improvements in security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with traveltime.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review traveltime.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.