Skip to main content

Security report for transit-festival.com

TRANSIT Festival · Hospitality · Belgium

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

34/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Transit Festival is a small-scale event organizer focused on a music and cultural festival held in Antwerp, Belgium. The website serves primarily as an informational and ticket sales portal, leveraging Webflow CMS and embedding a third-party ticketing platform (Eventix). The business targets festival attendees and music lovers in the region, positioning itself as a niche cultural event. The website content is well-structured and professionally designed, with consistent branding and clear event details. Social media integration via Instagram and Facebook supports community engagement and marketing efforts. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Webflow, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized and loads external resources over HTTPS, indicating a baseline of security and performance. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and privacy/cookie policies highlights areas for improvement in security and compliance. No forms collecting sensitive data are present, reducing immediate risk exposure. From a security perspective, the site shows moderate maturity with HTTPS usage and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing security headers, represent compliance and security gaps that should be addressed to meet GDPR and best practice standards. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business location and domain age, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and functional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures. Strategically, Transit Festival should prioritize implementing privacy and cookie policies, enable DNSSEC, and add security headers to improve trust and compliance. Adding clear contact information and incident response channels would further enhance credibility and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching transit-festival.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
34

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Transit Festival operates in the hospitality and entertainment sector, focusing on organizing a music festival event in Antwerp. The business model relies on ticket sales through a third-party platform, targeting local and regional audiences interested in cultural events. The company leverages social media channels for marketing and community engagement. The domain age and registrar information support a legitimate and consistent business presence since 2020. The festival's niche positioning and use of modern web technologies indicate a growth-oriented approach with potential for expansion. Partnerships with ticketing providers like Eventix enhance operational capabilities. However, the lack of formal privacy and security policies may limit trust among privacy-conscious customers.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers (such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), and privacy/cookie policies indicates gaps in security best practices and regulatory compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting readiness for security events. Embedded third-party scripts and iframes introduce potential risk vectors that require monitoring. Overall, the security maturity is basic and should be improved to reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and integrity.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to protect against common web attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails or phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  5. Establish an incident response process and publish vulnerability disclosure guidelines.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TRANSIT Festival
Description
Transit Festival is an event/festival business organizing a music and cultural festival in Antwerp, Belgium, scheduled for 21 June 2025 at VOGELZANG Antwerp.
Key services
Festival event organization, Ticket sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Eventix ticketing iframe
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by external scripts
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms collecting sensitive data on main page

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a festival event site with embedded ticket sales.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. Social media presence via Instagram and Facebook event links.
  5. Uses modern Webflow CMS and integrates third-party ticketing platform.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations.
  7. No forms collecting personal data on main page.
  8. No adult or explicit content detected.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site embeds a third-party ticketing iframe from Eventix, enabling online ticket sales. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security configuration. The site uses modern HTTPS protocols for external resources but does not provide explicit SSL configuration details. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal but present through meta tags. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires enhancements in security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with transit-festival.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review transit-festival.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.