Skip to main content

Security report for trackingplan.com

Trackingplan · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Trackingplan is a technology company specializing in automated digital analytics quality assurance and observability. Their SaaS platform enables businesses to automatically detect issues affecting their digital analytics, marketing pixels, and campaigns, providing real-time alerts and root cause analysis. Positioned as a trusted solution for data-driven organizations, Trackingplan integrates with major analytics and marketing platforms to deliver comprehensive monitoring and error detection. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, extensive resources, and a strong emphasis on privacy and compliance. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, asynchronous script loading, and multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools, ensuring fast performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforced, privacy masking in tracking scripts, and a cookie consent mechanism with opt-in capabilities. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-structured, and aligned with industry best practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of trackingplan.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: i74722xu2yvwb6taigbxx2rvvyppjyyhjgkwqxymz7yimzywjuka.mx-verification.google.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching trackingplan.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
74
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Trackingplan operates in the technology sector, targeting digital analysts, marketers, developers, QA teams, and agencies. Their business model is SaaS-based, focusing on analytics QA and observability. The company is trusted by over 200 tech leaders and offers key services such as automated audits, alerting, root cause analysis, campaign monitoring, and privacy risk detection. The platform supports integrations with a wide array of analytics and marketing tools, enhancing its market position. The website content and testimonials indicate a small but professional company with a consistent brand and strong trust signals. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company emphasizes privacy and compliance, catering to GDPR requirements and providing extensive documentation and resources to support customers.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and a variety of security best practices such as asynchronous script loading and privacy masking in tracking scripts. The presence of a cookie consent banner with opt-in functionality indicates compliance with privacy regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contacts, and a security.txt file suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident management readiness. Security headers are inferred but not explicitly confirmed in the HTML. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced documentation and explicit policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Audit and ensure all recommended security headers are present and properly configured.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Trackingplan
Description
Automatically detect what's affecting your digital analytics, maintain up-to-date tracking plans, and foster seamless collaboration with Trackingplan.
Key services
Automated discovery and audit of analytics implementations, Automated alert system for errors and changes, Automated root cause analysis, Campaign monitoring and privacy risk detection, Integration with major analytics and marketing platforms
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Tiny Slider, Lity Lightbox, PostHog analytics, Trackingplan proprietary scripts, Finsweet Cookie Consent, Ahrefs analytics, Factors.ai, Metricool tracker, Leadsy.ai tag, reb2b analytics
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Asynchronous script loading
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Privacy masking in tracking scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
PostHog, Ahrefs, Metricool, Google Analytics, Amplitude, Adobe Analytics, Mixpanel, Heap, Fullstory
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Pixel, TikTok, Criteo, Twitter Pixel, Pinterest Pixel, Linkedin Pixel
Tracking pixels
Amplitude, Adobe Analytics, Mixpanel, Snowplow, Hotjar, Heap, Fullstory, mParticle, Segment, Hubspot, Marketo, Intercom, Drift, Braze, Salesforce, Rudderstack, Optimizely
Marketing tools
PostHog, Metricool, Factors.ai
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on privacy and compliance with GDPR
  3. Comprehensive integration with major analytics and marketing platforms
  4. Robust cookie consent mechanism with opt-in
  5. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected
  6. Multiple customer testimonials and trust signals present
  7. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the main site
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as Tiny Slider and Lity Lightbox for UI components. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including PostHog, Ahrefs, Metricool, and proprietary Trackingplan scripts. The site is hosted likely behind Cloudflare CDN, ensuring fast content delivery and performance. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with accessibility and SEO considerations evident in meta tags and structured data. The technical implementation is robust, with asynchronous loading of scripts and privacy-focused data masking. There are no visible technical debts or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to enhance security documentation and incident response mechanisms to further strengthen the technical maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with trackingplan.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review trackingplan.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.