Tours City Pass is a small-sized tourism-focused business founded in 2020, offering digital city passes and related tourism packages for visitors to Tours, France. The website serves as an e-commerce platform enabling users to purchase passes, access interactive maps, and benefit from discounts and cultural offers. The business is positioned as a local tourism enabler with a clear target audience of tourists and visitors seeking cultural and leisure activities in the Tours metropolitan area. The parent company is Otipass, which provides the technological platform and payment processing services.
Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, React, and various analytics and tracking tools such as Matomo and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized, uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration, and integrates cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, some security headers are missing, and DNSSEC is not enabled, representing areas for improvement.
From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as encrypted communications, cookie consent, and no visible sensitive data exposure. There is no evidence of a published security policy or incident response plan, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanism is present. The WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, showing a domain age appropriate for the company’s founding date and no privacy protection, which supports transparency.
Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, with moderate technical sophistication and a solid security posture. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing formal security and incident response policies to further strengthen trust and compliance.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
72
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention tourscitypass.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for tourscitypass.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Tours City Pass operates in the hospitality and tourism sector, focusing on providing digital city passes that grant access to cultural and leisure sites in Tours, France. The business model is e-commerce based, selling passes online with immediate digital delivery. The company targets tourists and visitors interested in exploring the region's heritage and attractions. Competitive advantages include integration with a mobile app, interactive maps, and a savings calculator, enhancing user experience. The parent company Otipass supports the platform infrastructure and payment processing. The company maintains active social media channels and offers downloadable brochures, indicating a well-rounded marketing approach. Growth potential lies in expanding pass offerings and digital services. Partnerships with local tourism offices and cultural sites strengthen market presence.
Security posture
The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure payment indications. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented with granular user control, supporting GDPR compliance. Tracking and analytics tools are used responsibly with consent requirements. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No public security policy or incident response contact is available, limiting transparency in security governance. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which is a best practice for responsible vulnerability management. Overall, the site is secure for typical e-commerce and informational use but could improve in formal security documentation and technical header implementation.
Recommendations
Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to increase transparency and trust.
Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
Strong focus on local tourism and cultural promotion.
Good integration of cookie consent and privacy compliance.
Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
No visible security or privacy red flags.
WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business consistency.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a modern and diverse technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, React for UI components, and Owl Carousel for interactive elements. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts, and icons from FontAwesome. Analytics are handled via Matomo and Google Tag Manager, with Facebook Pixel for marketing. The site is hosted with OVH sas, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and CDN usage for static assets. Mobile optimization is good with responsive layouts and mobile menus. Accessibility is basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph tags, and structured JSON-LD data describing the organization. The CMS appears custom or proprietary, with no common CMS detected. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with tourscitypass.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tourscitypass.com.