Skip to main content

Security report for tourismebretagne.bzh

Tourisme Bretagne · Hospitality · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tourisme Bretagne operates as a regional tourism professional portal focused on the Brittany region of France. The website provides news, resources, and subscription-based services tailored to tourism professionals. It is positioned as an important regional authority or resource hub, likely supported by government or regional tourism bodies. The site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and integrates modern tracking and consent management tools, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tourismebretagne.bzh

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets tourism professionals in Brittany, offering news and services to support their activities. The use of WooCommerce subscriptions suggests a revenue model based on paid services or memberships. The site benefits from strong regional branding and consistent content quality. Its market position is that of a regional tourism authority or facilitator, with a focus on providing relevant and timely information. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage may indicate a focus on digital self-service or internal user authentication. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly visible but likely includes regional tourism stakeholders.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism via Didomi. However, there is no explicit security policy or incident response contact information published, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Security headers are not fully confirmed and should be audited. The use of up-to-date WordPress and WooCommerce plugins is implied but should be regularly maintained to prevent vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Audit and enhance HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Ensure all WordPress and WooCommerce plugins are regularly updated and security patches applied promptly.
  4. Improve accessibility compliance to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tourisme Bretagne
Description
Suivez l'actualité de Tourisme Bretagne et ses actions à destination des professionnels du tourisme.
Key services
Tourism news and updates, Professional resources and services, Subscription services (implied by WooCommerce Subscriptions plugin)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, WooCommerce Subscriptions, WooCommerce Stripe Gateway, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Didomi Consent Management, Privacy Center SDK
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML
  • Use of modern libraries and plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Didomi Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional portal for tourism professionals in Brittany, France.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for subscription services.
  3. Implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent via Didomi.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  5. No explicit terms of service page detected.
  6. Good SEO and metadata implementation with Yoast SEO plugin.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information on the site.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce and WooCommerce Subscriptions plugins, indicating e-commerce and membership capabilities. It uses jQuery, Font Awesome, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and UI enhancements. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes SEO best practices via Yoast SEO. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of styles and scripts. Consent management is handled by Didomi, integrated with a privacy center SDK. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The technical stack is modern and well-integrated but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tourismebretagne.bzh. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tourismebretagne.bzh.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.