Skip to main content

Security report for tourdetietema.com

Tour de Tietema · Media · Netherlands

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tour de Tietema is a Dutch media platform specializing in cycling-related content, including news, videos, and a webshop for cycling merchandise. The website is built on modern web technologies such as Webflow, enhanced with analytics and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management. The platform targets cycling enthusiasts and maintains a consistent brand presence with good content quality and user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers could be improved. No direct contact or security policies are publicly available, which may limit user trust in some areas. Overall, the site is professional, compliant with privacy regulations, and well-positioned within its niche media sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tourdetietema.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates primarily as a content and media provider within the cycling community in the Netherlands, leveraging a niche market with dedicated followers. Revenue streams likely include advertising, sponsored content, and merchandise sales via the webshop subdomain. The use of advanced consent management and analytics tools indicates a mature approach to digital marketing and user engagement. The absence of detailed contact or corporate information suggests a small to medium-sized operation focused on content delivery rather than large-scale enterprise services. Partnerships appear limited to related domains such as the webshop, with no evident large corporate affiliations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. Use of Google Tag Manager and Hotjar is managed through consent, reducing privacy risks. However, the lack of explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options is a minor gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policies are not publicly disclosed, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a media website but could benefit from additional hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations.
  4. Consider providing verified contact information such as company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tour de Tietema
Description
Tour de Tietema is a media and content platform focused on cycling, providing news, updates, and engaging content related to the cycling world.
Key services
News articles, Video content, Webshop for cycling-related merchandise
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Hotjar, Finsweet Attributes CMS Slider, Finsweet Attributes CMS Tabs, Google Fonts (Montserrat)
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Hotjar, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Sendinblue
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot
  3. No explicit contact information such as emails or phone numbers found on main pages
  4. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. No terms of service page detected
  6. Content is focused on cycling media and community engagement
  7. No security or incident response policies publicly disclosed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing modern front-end technologies and third-party integrations for fonts, analytics, and marketing automation. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured content. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA roles and keyboard navigation enhancements. The use of Cookiebot ensures compliance with privacy regulations, and Google Tag Manager facilitates controlled script deployment. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, providing reliable uptime and SSL support. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO and accessibility further, as well as to optimize loading times by auditing third-party scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tourdetietema.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tourdetietema.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.