Skip to main content

Security report for touchrespiratoryime.org

Touch Medical Media · Healthcare · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Touch Medical Media operates the touchRESPIRATORY platform, providing accredited continuing medical education (CME) and respiratory medicine content targeted at healthcare professionals. The website offers a range of educational activities, journal articles, and clinical updates developed in collaboration with expert faculty. The platform is positioned as a niche leader in respiratory medical education with a medium-sized operational scale and a founding date consistent with its domain registration in 2020. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and Google advertising and analytics tools, hosted with Cloudflare for DNS and registrar services. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility could be improved. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and some recommended security headers. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences, with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching touchrespiratoryime.org

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
78
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model centers on delivering accredited medical education and publishing respiratory-related content, monetized likely through advertising and sponsorships. The target audience includes clinicians and healthcare professionals specializing in respiratory diseases. The company maintains active social media engagement and partners with educational and editorial boards to enhance credibility. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its specialized content and CME accreditation. Growth indicators include recent content updates and a structured content offering. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains and editorial management platforms. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy policies and security disclosures to strengthen trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, reputable registrar and DNS services via Cloudflare, and domain transfer lock status. However, the absence of DNSSEC and some security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents potential areas of vulnerability. No explicit vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements but lacks a comprehensive privacy policy. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main site.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Review all forms for secure input validation and anti-CSRF protections to prevent injection attacks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Touch Medical Media
Description
Provides accredited continuing medical education (CME) content focused on respiratory medicine, developed with leading faculty and education partners to impact patient health outcomes.
Key services
Accredited CME learning activities, Journal articles and editorial content, Conference coverage, Clinical updates via email subscription
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google DoubleClick for Publishers (DFP), Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Heateor Social Login plugin, WP Rocket caching
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and registrar services

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick for Publishers
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional medical education platform focused on respiratory medicine.
  2. Content is well structured with accredited CME activities and journal articles.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the analyzed page.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Borlabs Cookie plugin.
  5. Multiple social media channels are linked, indicating active engagement.
  6. Security posture is good but can be improved with additional headers and DNSSEC.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is relatively new but consistent with business claims.
  9. Use of Cloudflare for DNS and registrar services enhances reliability and security.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery and various Google and social media tracking scripts. Hosting and DNS are managed by Cloudflare, providing robust infrastructure and security features. Performance is moderate, with caching via WP Rocket and asynchronous loading of scripts. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility is basic and could be improved. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and incomplete security headers. The site uses multiple third-party analytics and advertising services, which require careful privacy management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with touchrespiratoryime.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review touchrespiratoryime.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.