Skip to main content

Security report for touchneurologyime.org

Touch Medical Media · Healthcare · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Touch Medical Media operates the touchNEUROLOGY platform, providing accredited continuing medical education (CME) content focused on neurology. The website targets healthcare professionals and neurologists, offering educational activities, journal articles, and clinical updates designed to improve patient outcomes. The business is positioned as a reputable niche medical education provider with CME accreditation and a consistent brand presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and advertising integrations. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility could be improved. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and some security headers. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the analyzed page. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, with room for improvement in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching touchneurologyime.org

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
78
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages a content publishing business model focused on medical education, generating value through accredited CME activities and journal content. Its target customers are healthcare professionals seeking neurology education. The platform integrates advertising and tracking technologies for monetization and user insights. Partnerships with editorial management platforms and social media presence support its ecosystem. The domain age and registration data align with the business history, indicating legitimacy. Growth potential exists through expanded content offerings and enhanced compliance measures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS and clientTransferProhibited domain status. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of explicit security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The use of multiple third-party tracking and advertising scripts necessitates robust privacy controls. The site would benefit from implementing additional security headers and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main domain.
  3. Implement and publicly disclose a security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Touch Medical Media
Description
Provides accredited continuing medical education (CME) content focused on neurology to healthcare professionals, aiming to impact patient health outcomes through educational activities developed with leading faculty and education partners.
Key services
Accredited CME learning activities, Neurology journal articles, Conference highlights, Clinical updates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google DoubleClick for Publishers (DFP), Font Awesome, Select2, Borlabs Cookie, Heateor Social Login, Modernizr
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick for Publishers (DFP), Google AdSense (implied), Twitter Ads, Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Borlabs Cookie
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional medical education platform focused on neurology CME.
  2. Content is well structured with good SEO and accessibility basics.
  3. Uses multiple third-party analytics and advertising services with cookie consent.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the analyzed page.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the analyzed page.
  6. Domain registration and hosting are consistent and reputable.
  7. Security posture is good but can be improved with DNSSEC and additional headers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Select2, and Modernizr. It uses Google Tag Manager and Google DFP for advertising and analytics, alongside Facebook Pixel and Twitter tracking. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses Font Awesome icons. Cookie consent is managed via Borlabs Cookie plugin. Hosting and DNS are managed through Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. Some technical debt is indicated by missing DNSSEC and incomplete security headers. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs but can be enhanced for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with touchneurologyime.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review touchneurologyime.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.