Skip to main content

Security report for touchhaematologyime.org

touchHAEMATOLOGY · Healthcare · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

touchHAEMATOLOGY is a specialized medical education platform providing accredited CME content focused on haematology. The website offers clinical updates, expert articles, and journal content designed to improve patient outcomes and support healthcare professionals in their clinical practice. The platform is part of a broader network of Touch Medical Media sites, targeting healthcare professionals with high-quality educational resources. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, leveraging modern web technologies and third-party services such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and advertising. The site is hosted with Cloudflare DNS and registrar services, ensuring reliable domain management and HTTPS security. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent implemented but no visible privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences, with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching touchhaematologyime.org

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
78
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare and education sectors, focusing on continuing medical education for haematology professionals. Its business model centers on content publishing and accredited learning activities, supported by advertising and partnerships within the Touch Medical Media network. The company leverages a multi-domain ecosystem to cover related medical specialties, enhancing its market reach and authority. The target audience includes clinicians, researchers, and healthcare providers seeking up-to-date clinical education. The company appears medium-sized, founded in 2022, with consistent branding and a strong social media presence. Revenue streams likely include advertising, sponsorships, and possibly paid CME accreditation. Strategic partnerships with medical societies and editorial boards enhance credibility and content quality.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security transparency and DNS security hardening. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. Advertising and tracking scripts are present but standard for the industry. The site would benefit from adding security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy to improve trust and compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced to meet higher compliance standards such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main site.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance browser security.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and advertising tags to minimize privacy risks and improve transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
touchHAEMATOLOGY
Description
touchHAEMATOLOGY provides accredited continuing medical education (CME) content focused on haematology and related specialties. The content is designed to impact patient health outcomes by offering learning experiences developed with leading faculty and education partners. The site offers clinical updates, conference highlights, journal articles, and online medical education activities.
Key services
Accredited CME learning activities, Clinical updates and expert focus articles, Journal articles and conference coverage, Specialty-specific educational content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google DoubleClick for Publishers (DFP), Font Awesome, Select2, WP Rocket, Borlabs Cookie, Heateor Social Login
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick for Publishers
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Borlabs Cookie
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional CME education platform focused on haematology.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and specialty filters.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Borlabs Cookie plugin.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the analyzed content.
  6. Social media presence is strong with official Facebook, Twitter (X), Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn links.
  7. Security posture is good with HTTPS and domain transfer protection but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security policies.
  8. Advertising and tracking are present but standard for content publishing sites.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Select2, Font Awesome, and WP Rocket for performance optimization. It uses Google Tag Manager and Google DoubleClick for Publishers for analytics and advertising, alongside Facebook Pixel for retargeting. The site is hosted with Cloudflare DNS and registrar services, ensuring reliable uptime and HTTPS support. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to enhance security headers and privacy compliance. The site uses Borlabs Cookie for consent management, indicating attention to GDPR requirements. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with touchhaematologyime.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review touchhaematologyime.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.