Skip to main content

Security report for toptrans.cz

Toptrans · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Toptrans is a Czech Republic-based logistics company specializing in parcel and pallet transportation as well as warehousing services. The website presents a professional image with clear service offerings and dedicated contact information, targeting businesses and individuals requiring logistics solutions. The company highlights a 30-year history, indicating established market presence. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks such as Nuxt.js and integrates multiple tracking and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Adform, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight. While the site is accessible and mobile-optimized, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts privacy compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but no visible security headers or incident response information. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of toptrans.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching toptrans.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Toptrans operates in the transportation sector, providing essential logistics and warehousing services. Its business model focuses on service delivery for parcel and pallet shipping and storage solutions. The company targets a broad audience including businesses and private customers in the Czech Republic. The presence of a dedicated site for its 30-year history suggests a mature market position. The website's integration with multiple advertising and tracking platforms indicates active marketing efforts. However, the lack of detailed business registration data and privacy policies may affect credibility. The company appears to maintain a moderate size and consistent branding, with potential growth opportunities through enhanced digital trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms or input fields were detected, minimizing attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. The lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited transparency in security governance. Tracking technologies are extensively used, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing cookie consent and privacy policy disclosures. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear security incident response and vulnerability disclosure information on the website.
  4. Enhance WHOIS transparency or provide verified business registration details to improve trust.
  5. Review and limit tracking technologies to align with privacy best practices and user consent.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Toptrans
Description
Toptrans provides transportation and storage services, including parcel and pallet shipping and warehousing solutions.
Key services
Parcel and pallet transportation, Warehousing and storage, Packaging assistance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Adform tracking, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Seznam RC.js
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM implied)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
Adform, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registry issues
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found on the main page
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and email
  5. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and tracking technologies
  6. No forms detected on the main page
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. Website content is professional and relevant to logistics and warehousing
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Nuxt.js, a modern Vue.js framework, indicating a contemporary technical stack. It leverages multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts including Google Tag Manager, Adform, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight, which suggests active digital marketing and analytics usage. The site is mobile-optimized and loads multiple preloaded assets for performance. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the content. Performance is moderate with no explicit issues detected. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with no meta tags or structured data found. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with toptrans.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review toptrans.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.