Skip to main content

Security report for toptrans.cz

Toptrans · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Toptrans is a well-established transportation and logistics company operating primarily in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The company offers parcel and pallet shipping services alongside warehousing and packaging solutions, targeting businesses and individuals requiring reliable logistics support. The website reflects a professional business presence with clear contact information and a focus on service offerings. Technically, the site is built using modern JavaScript frameworks such as Nuxt.js and integrates multiple tracking and marketing technologies including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Adform. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks important security headers and visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces transparency but does not significantly detract from the site's legitimacy given the business context. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching toptrans.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Toptrans holds a strong market position in the transportation sector within the Czech Republic, leveraging over 30 years of operational history. Its business model focuses on providing comprehensive logistics services including transportation of parcels and pallets, warehousing, and packaging. The company targets both B2B and B2C segments, emphasizing flexibility and customer service. The website's integration of multiple marketing and tracking tools suggests an active digital marketing strategy. However, the absence of detailed business registration information and WHOIS transparency limits external verification. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries linked directly from the site. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand image and clear communication channels, supporting customer engagement and trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates room for improvement in mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields were detected on the main page, reducing immediate risk of injection attacks, but also limiting user interaction. The lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests limited transparency in security governance. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which may expose the company to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly enhanced by adopting best practices and improving transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement and configure essential security headers to protect against clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and cross-site scripting.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and demonstrate security maturity.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies to ensure they do not introduce vulnerabilities or privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Toptrans
Description
Toptrans is a transportation and logistics company offering parcel and pallet shipping services as well as warehousing and packaging solutions.
Key services
Parcel and pallet transportation, Warehousing, Packaging services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Adform tracking, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Seznam RC.js, Nuxt.js
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM implied)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
Adform tracking, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found on main page or linked content
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with company email and phone
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registry limitations
  5. Modern JavaScript frameworks and tracking technologies are used
  6. No forms detected on the main page content
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present
  9. No certifications or security frameworks mentioned
  10. Website content is professional and relevant to transportation and logistics
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Nuxt.js framework, leveraging modern JavaScript modules and asynchronous script loading for performance optimization. It uses multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Adform tracking pixels. The site is mobile responsive with preloading and prefetching of critical assets to improve load times. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML content. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in compliance and security best practices. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in SEO and accessibility. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional business website but requires enhancements to meet higher security and compliance standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with toptrans.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review toptrans.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.