Skip to main content

Security report for topshelf.lv

Top Shelf Bartending · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Top Shelf Bartending is a Latvian-based service provider specializing in professional bartending and bar services for weddings and corporate events. The company positions itself as a quality service provider with a strong portfolio of over 324 events and 6000 guests served, focusing on customized client approaches and flexible drink procurement models. The website content is well-structured, professionally designed, and targets individuals and organizations planning events in Latvia. Technically, the website is built on the Webnode CMS platform, hosted via AWS Cloudfront CDN, and integrates modern tracking and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks important security headers and explicit privacy and terms of service documentation. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain trust verification, but the website content and contact information suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site scores well on business credibility and content quality but should improve privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching topshelf.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on bartending services for weddings and corporate events in Latvia. Its business model revolves around providing professional bartenders and bar setups, with a pay-per-consumed drink pricing model. The company leverages a portfolio showcasing extensive event experience and customer testimonials to build trust. The target market includes event planners, couples, and corporate clients seeking quality bar services. The website's use of multiple tracking and marketing tools indicates an active approach to customer engagement and retargeting. However, the lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies may pose compliance risks. The company appears to be a small-sized local business with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. The use of Webnode CMS suggests a focus on ease of website management rather than custom development.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses third-party analytics and tracking scripts, which may introduce privacy concerns if not properly managed. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor any vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. The lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies also indicates gaps in compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, while the site is not evidently vulnerable, it would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible from the website to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add terms of service and incident response information to provide transparency and preparedness for security incidents.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with data protection regulations.
  5. Consider obtaining and publishing WHOIS data or using verified domain registration to improve domain trustworthiness and business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Top Shelf Bartending
Description
Top Shelf Bartending piedāvā kvalitatīvus kāzu bāru pakalpojumus un nodrošina bāra apkalpošanu dažādos pasākumos.
Key services
Professional bartending services, Bar services for weddings and corporate events, Drink procurement with pay-per-consumed model, Customized client approach
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Cloudfront CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async loading for analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to bartending services for weddings and corporate events.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email and phone.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, but cookie consent mechanism is present.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. Use of multiple analytics and tracking scripts indicates moderate user tracking.
  7. No security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
  8. Website built on Webnode CMS and uses AWS Cloudfront CDN for hosting.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webnode CMS platform and uses AWS Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, which supports good availability and performance. The tech stack includes JavaScript with asynchronous loading of analytics and tracking scripts from Google and Facebook, indicating a modern approach to user behavior tracking and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and uses SVG images for icons, enhancing visual quality and scalability. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved to meet higher standards. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts. There is no evidence of server-side frameworks or advanced backend technologies from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small service business website but could be enhanced for security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with topshelf.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review topshelf.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.