Top Only Stars is a niche adult content curation website focusing on ranking and finding popular pornstars and OnlyFans creators. The site operates primarily as an affiliate marketing platform, linking users to adult cam and AI girl services. Technically, it is built on WordPress with a modern theme and SEO plugins, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, and uses HTTPS. However, the domain is very new (registered in 2024) despite content dating back to 2019, indicating possible content migration or rebranding. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking essential security headers and privacy policies. Contact information is minimal and uses a generic Gmail address, which may reduce trust. Overall, the site provides good content quality and user experience but needs improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention toponlystars.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for toponlystars.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The website targets adult content consumers interested in curated lists of pornstars and OnlyFans creators. Its business model relies on affiliate marketing partnerships with adult cam and AI girl platforms. Market positioning is niche with a focus on content curation rather than original content creation. The site shows consistent branding and good SEO optimization but lacks transparent business and contact information. Partnerships with wmctjd.com and trackcherry.com indicate an affiliate ecosystem. Growth potential depends on expanding trust signals and compliance adherence.
Security posture
The site uses HTTPS and domain registration protections but lacks critical security headers such as CSP and HSTS. No privacy or cookie policies are present, exposing compliance risks under GDPR. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page indicates low incident response readiness. Forms are minimal (search only) but no explicit security measures are visible. The generic contact email and lack of business registration details reduce credibility. Overall security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet industry standards.
Recommendations
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
Add standard security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Establish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure process to enhance incident response readiness.
Replace generic contact email with a company domain email to improve business credibility.
Enable DNSSEC for the domain to strengthen DNS security.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Description
Website providing curated lists and finder services for top pornstars and OnlyFans creators, including categorized content by ethnicity, body type, and popularity.
Key services
Top pornstar rankings, OnlyFans finder, Affiliate links to adult cam and AI girl sites
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, PHP, jQuery 3.7.1, Themify Ultra Theme, Master Popups Plugin, Yoast SEO Plugin, Cloudflare DNS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Marketing tools
Master Popups plugin
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is a WordPress-based adult content curation site
No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
Uses affiliate marketing links to adult cam and AI girl sites
No security headers detected, which is a security weakness
Domain is very new (2024) but content dates back to 2019, indicating possible content migration
No contact phone numbers or social media links found
Only one contact email found in footer (spetsnazz555@gmail.com) which is a generic Gmail address, reducing trust
No evidence of security or incident response policies
SEO optimized with Yoast plugin and structured data
Mobile optimized with responsive design
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using the Themify Ultra theme and Master Popups plugin. It leverages jQuery 3.7.1 and Yoast SEO for optimization. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and structured data for SEO. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed by Cloudflare. Performance is moderate with preloading and deferred scripts. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled. The domain is newly registered in 2024, which may indicate recent site launch or migration. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and clearer business information.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with toponlystars.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review toponlystars.com.