Skip to main content

Security report for topclub.lv

TOP Club Riga | LGBT | Gay | Disco lounge · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TOP Club is a specialized nightclub located in the center of Riga, Latvia, catering primarily to the gay and LGBT community. It positions itself as the only gay and LGBT nightclub in Riga, offering nightlife entertainment with two bars, a disco floor, and dark-rooms. The business targets mature audiences interested in nightlife and LGBT social spaces. Technically, the website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging Wix's hosting and content management infrastructure. It uses common web technologies including Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The site is mobile optimized and presents a professional design consistent with its brand identity. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and some Wix security scripts but lacks explicit security headers and privacy compliance documentation, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, indicating good availability. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, and adding incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching topclub.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, specifically nightlife and entertainment for the LGBT community in Riga. It holds a unique market position as the sole gay and LGBT nightclub in the city, which may provide competitive advantage and niche market capture. The business model revolves around venue-based entertainment services including bars and disco events. Revenue streams likely include entrance fees, beverage sales, and event hosting. The website's content and structured data confirm the physical location and contact phone number, supporting business credibility. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website data. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the current data. The company maintains a consistent brand image and targets a mature audience interested in LGBT nightlife.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and Wix's built-in security scripts active. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR requirements. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could hinder timely security issue reporting and resolution. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking, which should be balanced with privacy compliance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced with better policy documentation and security header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish security incident response contact information and consider a vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize security risks and enhance privacy compliance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors, including those with disabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TOP Club Riga | LGBT | Gay | Disco lounge
Description
TOP Club is located in the center of Riga. The only one Gay & LGBT nightclub in Riga, Latvia. Two bars, disco floor, dark-rooms
Key services
Nightclub, Disco lounge, Bars, Dark-rooms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Core-js polyfills
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-related JS overrides by Wix

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website built on Wix platform with typical Wix scripts and assets.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information includes phone and physical address in Riga, Latvia.
  4. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  5. No email addresses or social media links explicitly found in HTML.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No visible security incident response contacts.
  9. Content is focused on LGBT nightlife and club services.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, which provides a managed hosting environment and content management system. The technology stack includes Wix's proprietary scripts, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site uses modern JavaScript polyfills for compatibility and performance. Performance is moderate with standard Wix optimizations. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability on various devices. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but could be improved with richer content and structured data. Accessibility is basic, with some focus management and skip links but lacking advanced ARIA roles or landmarks. The site does not expose sensitive data or use outdated libraries, indicating low technical risk. However, the lack of explicit security headers and privacy documentation represents technical debt and compliance risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with topclub.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review topclub.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.