Skip to main content

Security report for topcleanpackaging.com

Top Clean Packaging · Healthcare · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Top Clean Packaging is a well-established multinational company specializing in the development and manufacturing of medical and pharmaceutical devices, with a strong presence in France, Italy, China, and India. The company offers a broad range of services including thermoforming, plastic injection molding, liquid silicone rubber injection, sterile packaging, and assembly. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting healthcare and pharmaceutical sectors. Technically, the website employs modern analytics tools such as Matomo and Google Analytics, and uses responsive design techniques to ensure good user experience across devices. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and business information appear credible and professional. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and has a cookie consent mechanism but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies, indicating room for improvement in security posture. Overall, the website scores well in content quality and business credibility but should address WHOIS transparency and enhance security practices to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching topcleanpackaging.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the healthcare manufacturing sector, focusing on medical device production and sterile packaging. With a history dating back to 1927 and multiple international subsidiaries, Top Clean Packaging positions itself as a reliable partner for pharmaceutical and medical device companies. Their business model centers on B2B contract manufacturing and project development, supported by a diversified technology portfolio. The website highlights certifications such as Agrément CIR, reinforcing their innovation credentials. The presence of multiple production sites and a significant workforce indicates a medium-sized enterprise with substantial operational capacity. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to engage its target audience and maintain market visibility. However, the lack of WHOIS data transparency could impact partner trust and should be addressed.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent banner indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. The use of third-party analytics scripts introduces potential privacy risks, though mitigated by consent mechanisms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. To enhance security maturity, the company should implement comprehensive security headers, publish security policies, and consider a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Investigate and resolve the absence of WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  4. Regularly update and audit third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide more comprehensive compliance documentation to improve user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Top Clean Packaging
Description
Top Clean Packaging is an international group specializing in the development and manufacturing of medical and pharmaceutical devices, including sterile packaging and assembly. Established in 1927, it operates in France, Italy, China, and India, offering technologies such as thermoforming, plastic injection molding, LSR injection, assembly, and sterile packaging.
Key services
Thermoforming, Plastic injection molding, Liquid silicone rubber (LSR) injection, Sterile packaging and assembly, Mold design and manufacturing, Complementary services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Typekit Fonts, Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in French and multilingual options
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, raising domain legitimacy questions
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  6. Professional business presentation with clear contact information
  7. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools with cookie consent
  8. No visible forms collecting sensitive data on homepage
  9. No exposed emails found in HTML content
  10. Phone number and physical address clearly displayed in footer
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack including Typekit for fonts, Swiper.js for sliders, and integrates Matomo and Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is multilingual with clear navigation and structured content. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, there is no evidence of advanced frameworks or platforms. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved security headers and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with topcleanpackaging.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review topcleanpackaging.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.