Skip to main content

Security report for topagrar.com

top agrar · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

top agrar is a leading German-language agricultural news platform providing up-to-date information on agricultural politics, markets, technology, and livestock. The website targets agricultural professionals and stakeholders in Germany and offers subscription-based premium content alongside free news, newsletters, job listings, and weather forecasts. The business model is primarily media publishing supported by advertising and subscriptions. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks, consent management via Usercentrics, and integrates multiple third-party ad and analytics services. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with a professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and secure login forms, though explicit security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with cookie consent and privacy policies in place. However, the WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the website is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy for its audience, but domain registration inconsistencies should be investigated further.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of topagrar.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching topagrar.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

top agrar holds a strong market position as a specialized agricultural media outlet in Germany, serving a niche audience of farmers, agribusiness professionals, and policymakers. Its revenue streams include advertising, subscriptions (topplus), and an online shop. The platform's extensive content offerings and integration of market data and weather forecasts provide competitive advantages. The presence of social media channels and newsletters supports audience engagement and brand loyalty. The lack of visible company contact details on the website may limit direct customer interaction but aligns with a media publishing model. The website's technical infrastructure supports scalability and content delivery but relies on multiple third-party services, which may impact data privacy and security.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, secure login forms protected by CSRF tokens, and a consent management platform for GDPR compliance. However, explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly present, which could expose the site to clickjacking or MIME sniffing attacks. The use of multiple third-party scripts for ads and analytics introduces potential risks if not regularly audited. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Incident response and security policies are not publicly disclosed, which is a gap in transparency. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced header policies and public security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear security and incident response policies to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  4. Add explicit company contact information to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  5. Consider implementing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
top agrar
Description
Neuigkeiten rund um die Landwirtschaft auf top agrar – Top aktuelle News zu den Themen Politik, Markt, Landtechnik, Rind, Schwein und Geflügel.
Key services
Agricultural news and market reports, Subscription-based content (topplus), Newsletter services, Job market listings, Agricultural weather forecasts, Online shop
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics (Consent Management), YouTube API, Symplr Ad Management, upScore, pw.thenewsbar.net, Livewire (indicated by nprogress styles)
Frameworks
Livewire (Laravel), Usercentrics CMP
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management implemented
  • Secure login form with CSRF token

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, upScore, pw.thenewsbar.net
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Symplr
Tracking pixels
upScore, pw.thenewsbar.net
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in German language.
  2. No WAF or blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered in the queried WHOIS database.
  4. Strong presence of third-party scripts for ads, tracking, and consent management.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Login form uses CSRF token and password visibility toggle.
  7. Social media links to Facebook, Twitter (X), Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn, WhatsApp present.
  8. Cookie consent managed by Usercentrics.
  9. Advertising managed by Symplr.
  10. Content is agricultural news focused, safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-heavy front end with integrations including Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics for consent management, YouTube API, and ad management via Symplr. The CMS appears custom or Laravel-based with Livewire components. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site uses multiple asynchronous scripts for tracking and ads, which may impact load times and privacy. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional media platform but could benefit from performance tuning and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with topagrar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review topagrar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.