TONUS ELAST SIA is a Latvian company specializing in the manufacture and sale of medical elastic products such as compression stockings, orthopedic belts, and back supports. Established since 1995, the company has a medium-sized operation with a presence in 45 countries, targeting individuals requiring medical compression and orthopedic solutions. The website reflects a professional e-commerce platform with good content quality, clear navigation, and mobile optimization. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel, ensuring a moderate to good performance and user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers and explicit policies are missing. The absence of WHOIS domain registration data is a concern for domain legitimacy but does not detract significantly from the business credibility given the detailed contact information and partner endorsements. Overall, the site is safe, trustworthy, and well-positioned in the healthcare e-commerce sector.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention lv.tonuselast.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for lv.tonuselast.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company operates in the healthcare and e-commerce sectors, manufacturing and selling medical compression products directly to consumers. Its market position is strengthened by endorsements from reputable Latvian medical institutions and a broad international reach. The business model focuses on product quality, customer service, and online sales. The presence of multiple language options and detailed health-related content indicates a customer-centric approach. Revenue streams likely include direct product sales and possibly partnerships with healthcare providers. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website, active social media presence, and regular content updates. The partnership ecosystem includes several Latvian hospitals and clinics, enhancing brand trust and market penetration.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response information, and some recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts is standard but should be regularly audited for security. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the website content, suggesting room for improvement in transparency and preparedness.
Recommendations
Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness.
Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS domain registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
TONUS ELAST SIA
Description
TONUS ELAST ir Latvijas uzņēmums, kas ražo medicīniskos elastīgos izstrādājumus – sākot no saitēm, kompresijas zeķēm, līdz pat sarežģītiem muguras balsta izstrādājumiem.
Key services
Manufacture of medical elastic products, E-commerce sales of compression stockings, orthopedic belts, and supports
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Cookie consent modal
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
Strong focus on medical compression products and health-related information.
Multiple customer testimonials and partner endorsements from reputable medical institutions.
Clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
No adult or questionable content detected.
Good mobile optimization and user experience.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built using modern front-end technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, with integration of Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking and marketing. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for good user experience. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. The CMS or e-commerce platform is custom or not explicitly identified. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and structured content. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and the absence of some security headers. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, which could be a consideration for infrastructure transparency.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with lv.tonuselast.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lv.tonuselast.com.