Skip to main content

Security report for tomtomcoffee.co.uk

Tomtom Limited · Hospitality · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tomtom Coffee House is a specialist coffee shop located in Belgravia, London, known for its high-quality coffee made from Allpress roast beans. The business targets coffee enthusiasts and local customers in the West End area, operating a retail coffee shop model with a strong local reputation. The website is built on WordPress using common plugins and frameworks such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Contact Form 7, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site includes marketing and analytics tools like Google Analytics and Crazy Egg, and offers newsletter signup forms for customer engagement. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response or security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic, with some GDPR compliance indicators. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable due to a domain registration error indicating the domain name is invalid under Nominet UK rules, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy or configuration. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced security practices and clearer compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tomtomcoffee.co.uk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on specialty coffee retail in a premium London location. The business model is straightforward retail with a focus on quality and local reputation. The website supports customer engagement through newsletter signups but lacks direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage, relying on contact forms. The absence of active social media links suggests limited social media marketing. The domain registration anomaly may indicate use of a subdomain or alias rather than a fully registered domain, which could affect brand trust. The company appears small in size with no evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies. The use of common WordPress plugins and marketing tools indicates a standard digital marketing approach without advanced integrations.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses standard security practices such as no exposed sensitive data and secure forms. However, it lacks important security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible security or incident response policy, and no dedicated contact channels for security incidents. The privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms are present but basic, with limited GDPR compliance indicators. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools introduces moderate user tracking. The WHOIS data failure and domain registration error are notable concerns for domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers, documented policies, and better compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Complete and properly configure Google Analytics integration via MonsterInsights to ensure secure and compliant analytics tracking.
  3. Develop and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan, including dedicated contact channels for security issues.
  4. Enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data retention policies.
  5. Investigate and resolve domain registration issues to ensure domain legitimacy and improve trust with customers.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tomtom Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tomtom Limited
Description
Tomtom Coffee House is a specialist coffee shop located at the corner of Elizabeth Street and Ebury Street in Belgravia, London. It is known for producing high-quality coffee using Allpress roast beans and expert baristas.
Key services
Specialist coffee drinks, Coffee house experience
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Flexslider, SimpleLightbox, Google Analytics, Crazy Egg, MailChimp for WordPress, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by Contact Form 7 and MonsterInsights)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Crazy Egg
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Crazy Egg
Marketing tools
MailChimp for WordPress
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based coffee shop site with good content and design.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to domain registration error.
  3. No explicit security policies or incident response information found.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic.
  5. No phone numbers or emails explicitly listed on homepage; contact form used for communication.
  6. No social media links currently active or visible in header/footer.
  7. Uses common marketing and analytics tools like Google Analytics and Crazy Egg.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a standard set of plugins and frameworks including Bootstrap, jQuery, Flexslider, and SimpleLightbox. It uses Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling and icons. The site loads analytics scripts asynchronously for performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by meta tags and canonical links. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The domain registration error suggests possible technical misconfiguration or use of a subdomain rather than a registered domain, which should be addressed to avoid trust issues.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tomtomcoffee.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tomtomcoffee.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.