Skip to main content

Security report for toffifee.com

Storck · Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.toffifee.com represents the Toffifee confectionery brand, part of the Storck group. It provides product information, brand history, and country-specific site links targeting a general family audience. The site is professionally designed with excellent content quality, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency. The technical infrastructure is based on TYPO3 CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and includes a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicating GDPR compliance. However, the WHOIS data for the domain is missing, which raises some concerns about domain registration legitimacy despite the professional appearance and brand association. Security posture is good with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks published security policies or incident response contacts. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained but would benefit from improved transparency in domain registration and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: secondary.netuse.de

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory
    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: secondary.sczn.de

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching toffifee.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
40
DNS health
40
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention toffifee.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for toffifee.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Toffifee operates as a retail consumer goods brand under the Storck umbrella, focusing on confectionery products combining hazelnut, nougat, caramel, and chocolate. The website supports international markets with localized versions and links to partner sites. The business model centers on brand awareness and consumer engagement rather than direct e-commerce. The presence of multiple related brand domains indicates a strong partnership ecosystem within Storck. The site targets families and general consumers, positioning Toffifee as a fun and unique treat. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main site suggests a controlled communication channel via contact forms. The brand's market position is established and supported by consistent branding and professional digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent mechanisms, and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. The use of Piwik PRO for analytics indicates a preference for privacy-conscious tracking. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts are gaps that could be addressed to enhance security maturity. The missing WHOIS data is a notable concern from a trust perspective, as domain registration transparency is important for legitimacy verification. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the content. Overall, the site is secure but could improve in transparency and formal security disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Provide a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Enhance contact information availability by including verified company emails or phone numbers for support and security reporting.
  5. Consider implementing a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Storck
Description
Toffifee is a confectionery brand offering a unique combination of hazelnut, creamy nougat, caramel and chocolate, targeting families and general consumers.
Key services
Product information, Country-specific brand sites, Consumer service
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, RequireJS, Lodash, jQuery, Piwik PRO Tag Manager
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik PRO
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik PRO
Marketing tools
Piwik PRO Tag Manager
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Uses TYPO3 CMS with modern JavaScript libraries
  3. Strong branding consistency with Storck group
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact via form
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Good SEO and mobile optimization
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, leveraging RequireJS for JavaScript module loading, and includes libraries such as jQuery and Lodash. It uses Piwik PRO Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a modern and privacy-aware analytics setup. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and layouts, and SEO meta tags are well implemented including Open Graph and Twitter Card metadata. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented, supporting a professional user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with toffifee.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review toffifee.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.