Skip to main content

Security report for tnaflix.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TNAFLIX.COM operates as a large-scale free adult video streaming platform offering millions of videos across numerous categories. The site targets adult users seeking free pornographic content and supports user accounts and video uploads. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics and Bootstrap for UI components, with moderate mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, the security posture is weak with no detected security headers, unclear SSL configuration, and no visible privacy or cookie policies, which raises compliance concerns. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain significantly impacts trust and legitimacy assessments. Overall, while the site is functional and content-rich, it lacks transparency and robust security measures, posing risks to user privacy and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tnaflix.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a leading free porn site with a broad content offering and a business model reliant on advertising and user-generated content. Its market position is strong within the adult media sector, targeting a global adult audience. The site leverages advertising networks and tracking tools to monetize traffic but lacks visible business contact information or certifications. The partnership ecosystem includes advertising and live sex streaming partner domains. Growth indicators include extensive video categories and multi-language support. Strategic observations suggest a need for improved compliance and trust-building measures to sustain growth and user confidence.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is low. Key vulnerabilities include the absence of security headers, no visible privacy or cookie policies, and lack of contact channels for incident response. The domain's WHOIS data is unavailable, which is a red flag for legitimacy and accountability. There is no evidence of compliance with GDPR or other data protection frameworks. The site uses HTTPS (implied but not confirmed in data), but SSL configuration details are unknown. Incident response readiness appears minimal due to lack of security contact information. Overall, the security culture and practices require significant enhancement to protect users and comply with regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Ensure domain WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy and trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and abuse reporting channels.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities and improve compliance with GDPR and other regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
TNAFLIX is one of the fastest growing free porn sites in the world. Choose from millions of free high quality videos in every category you can imagine.
Key services
Free porn video streaming, User account management, Video upload, Live sex streaming
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Bootstrap (implied by dropdown and btn classes), Turbolinks, JavaScript ES6+, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
admjmp.com
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a free adult content streaming platform with extensive video categories
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links explicitly found
  4. Site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and admjmp.com for advertising
  5. No security headers or explicit security policies detected
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, raising concerns about domain registration transparency
  7. Site is accessible without WAF or security challenge blocking content
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap and JavaScript frameworks, supported by Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and structured with clear navigation and SEO meta tags. However, there is no detected CMS or hosting provider information. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. The absence of security headers and unclear SSL configuration represent technical risks. There is opportunity to modernize security infrastructure and improve accessibility features to enhance user experience and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tnaflix.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tnaflix.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.