Skip to main content

Security report for titanka.com

TITANKA! Spa · Hospitality · San Marino

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TITANKA! Spa is a specialized digital marketing and technology solutions provider focused on the tourism and hospitality sector, serving hotels, camping villages, and destinations primarily in Italy and San Marino. With over 25 years of experience, the company offers tailored services including web marketing, chatbot AI, performance hubs, and hospitality marketing mix solutions. The website reflects a mature business with a consistent brand and a clear target audience. Technically, the site uses a proprietary CMS and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, but suffers from slow load times and lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical security concern. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive GDPR policy and cookie consent mechanism. The security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and security headers, exposing the site to potential risks. Overall, the business appears legitimate and established, but urgent improvements in security infrastructure are recommended to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching titanka.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as an essential player in the hospitality digital marketing niche, leveraging a strong portfolio of clients and partnerships with firms like Semplify and SocialPiù. Its business model revolves around providing customized digital solutions and marketing strategies to tourism-related businesses, supported by certifications such as Google Analytics Certified and Google Premier Partner status. The target market includes hotels, camping villages, and tourism destinations, with a focus on increasing direct sales and visibility. The company demonstrates growth through diversified service offerings and a robust online presence, including active social media channels and a regularly updated blog. The domain age and WHOIS data corroborate the company's maturity and legitimacy, supporting its market credibility.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is suboptimal. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support is a critical vulnerability that undermines data confidentiality and user trust. No modern TLS protocols or security headers are implemented, increasing exposure to common web attacks. While SPF and DMARC records are correctly configured, indicating good email security practices, the lack of HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption mechanisms further weakens the security stance. The site does not disclose any incident response or security policy information, which could be improved to demonstrate security maturity. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and implementation of security headers are essential to elevate the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Activate HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives to enforce HTTPS.
  5. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  6. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  7. Optimize website performance to reduce load times and improve user experience.
  8. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TITANKA! Spa
Registration number
Iscritto al Registro e-commerce al nr. 791 dal 07/10/2020
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a proprietary CMS (TITANKA! CMS) and uses Bootstrap for responsive design. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Bing UET. The site features interactive elements such as sliders (Splide.js) and embedded videos (Lite YouTube embed). Despite a rich content structure and good mobile optimization, the site suffers from slow loading times (over 15 seconds) and a large page size (~630 KB). The absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of security headers are significant technical risks. The DNS and SPF configurations are properly set, supporting email security. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires modernization and security enhancements to improve reliability and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 51/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with titanka.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review titanka.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.