Skip to main content

Security report for tipada-shop.de

TIPADA-Shop · Retail · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TIPADA-Shop is a German-based e-commerce retailer specializing in plush toys, school articles, and gift items targeting families, children, and animal lovers. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a clear focus on providing themed gift ideas and accessories. The business model centers on online retail with free shipping offers and fast delivery from Germany, positioning itself as a niche player in the gift and toy market. The site integrates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics 4, Google Ads, and Brevo, while maintaining GDPR compliance through a comprehensive consent management system. Technical infrastructure is based on the JTL Shop system, hosted on netcup servers, and employs standard web technologies including jQuery and Bootstrap.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tipada-shop.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
43
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a focused retail e-commerce platform with a clear target audience of gift buyers and families interested in plush toys and related products. The presence of a marketplace subdomain suggests a broader ecosystem or partnership network. The business leverages digital marketing and analytics to optimize user engagement and advertising ROI. The lack of explicit contact emails or phone numbers on the site indicates a preference for contact via web forms, which may impact direct customer support responsiveness. The company appears to be a small-sized enterprise with a localized German market focus.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced, anonymized IP tracking in analytics, and a robust cookie consent mechanism. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not visibly configured, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The login form includes CSRF tokens, indicating secure form handling practices. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the site maintains good security hygiene suitable for its business scale.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Provide explicit contact details such as company email and phone numbers to improve customer support and business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TIPADA-Shop
Description
Tierisch gute Geschenkideen: Kuscheltiere, Schulartikel und mehr! Versandfrei ab 25 €, schneller Versand aus DE. Perfekt für kleine Entdecker und Tierfreund
Key services
Online retail of plush toys, School articles, Gift ideas, Free shipping over 25€, Fast shipping from Germany
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, Google Ads, Brevo (Sendinblue), JTL Shop System, FontAwesome, Bootstrap CSS framework
Frameworks
JTL Shop
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies and tracking
  • Anonymize IP in Google Analytics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login form with CSRF token

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Brevo (Sendinblue)
Marketing tools
Brevo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a German e-commerce shop specializing in plush toys and gift items.
  2. Strong GDPR compliance with explicit consent management for cookies and tracking.
  3. Uses modern analytics and advertising tools with user privacy considerations.
  4. No visible security or content blocking issues.
  5. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business operations.
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via form only.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Good mobile optimization and user experience.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the JTL Shop platform, utilizing jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap CSS, and FontAwesome for UI components. It integrates Google Tag Manager for tag management, Google Analytics 4 for user behavior tracking with IP anonymization, and Google Ads for advertising and remarketing. The hosting is managed via netcup, as indicated by the nameservers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses deferred and async loading for scripts to optimize load times. There is room for technical improvements in security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tipada-shop.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tipada-shop.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.