Skip to main content

Security report for tinyhouse.lv

tinyhouse.lv · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

tinyhouse.lv is a small Latvian workshop specializing in the custom design and construction of energy efficient wooden tiny houses, adhering to Passive House principles. Their market focus is on environmentally conscious customers across Europe seeking insulated, solid wood tiny homes. The website is professionally designed using the Wix platform, featuring clear business descriptions and contact information, but lacks some compliance documentation such as privacy and terms of service pages. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized, with moderate performance and basic SEO. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but could be improved by adding security headers and formal security policies. Overall, the business appears legitimate and trustworthy, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tinyhouse.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
48
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tinyhouse.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for tinyhouse.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the niche energy-efficient housing sector, leveraging Passive House standards to differentiate itself. Their business model centers on bespoke tiny house design and delivery across Europe, targeting environmentally aware consumers. The website's structured data and consistent branding support credibility. The use of Wix indicates a small to medium scale operation with limited in-house technical resources. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The presence of Microsoft Clarity analytics suggests an interest in user behavior insights for marketing optimization.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs a cookie consent banner, indicating basic compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of privacy policy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap. No security headers were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No forms or input fields were found, reducing attack surface. The use of third-party scripts like Microsoft Clarity introduces moderate tracking but no known vulnerabilities. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are missing, which could hinder timely security issue management.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts to improve security transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve website reach and usability.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
tinyhouse.lv
Description
tinyhouse.lv is a workshop in Latvia that individually designs and builds energy efficient wooden tiny houses that can be delivered across Europe. We implement Passive House principles in each build. We use solid wood in exterior and interior of our builds!
Key services
Design of energy efficient wooden tiny houses, Construction of insulated tiny houses, Delivery of tiny houses across Europe
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with modern design
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected
  5. Contact phone and address clearly provided in structured data
  6. No forms detected in the provided HTML content
  7. Uses Microsoft Clarity for analytics and user behavior tracking
  8. No security headers detected in HTML source
  9. No suspicious or malicious content found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using Wix Thunderbolt framework, leveraging modern JavaScript and CSS. It is hosted by Wix, ensuring reliable uptime and SSL support. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features appear basic. SEO metadata is present but could be expanded. No forms or complex interactive elements were detected, simplifying security considerations but limiting user engagement. The site uses Microsoft Clarity for analytics, indicating some level of user behavior tracking. Overall, the technical infrastructure is suitable for a small business website but could benefit from enhancements in security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tinyhouse.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tinyhouse.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.