Skip to main content

Security report for tills.se

Tills · Media · Sweden

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tills is a Swedish communication agency specializing in branding, digital communication, events, film, identity, campaigns, and print services. Established around 2015, the company targets businesses seeking to enhance their communication and brand presence. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with a portfolio showcasing various projects and clients. The company maintains active social media profiles on Instagram and LinkedIn, supporting its market presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing common libraries such as jQuery and LiteSpeed Cache for performance optimization. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, performance is moderate, and accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers and does not provide visible security policies or incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. No forms are present on the homepage, reducing immediate data collection risks. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices and privacy compliance to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tills.se

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tills.se, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for tills.se right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tills operates as a small-sized communication agency within the media sector in Sweden. Its business model focuses on delivering comprehensive communication services including branding, digital campaigns, events, and print media. The company leverages a portfolio approach to showcase its expertise and attract clients. Its market positioning is that of an established agency with a clear Swedish focus and a consistent brand identity. The active social media presence supports client engagement and marketing efforts. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent operation. The company appears to have steady growth potential based on project diversity and digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options exposes the site to potential risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements, posing regulatory risks. No signs of vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy with dedicated contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to obtain user consent for tracking and cookies.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tillsgruppen Ab
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tills
Description
Kommunikation som skapar tillväxt
Key services
Branding, Digital communication, Event management, Film production, Identity design, Campaigns, Print media
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, LiteSpeed Cache
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. Contact information is limited to email and physical address; no phone number found
  4. Social media presence is active and linked
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with common libraries and scripts
  6. No security headers detected, which is a security improvement area
  7. No forms detected on the homepage; contact form likely on separate contact page
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. Content is primarily in Swedish language
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.0.9 and uses jQuery 3.6.0 along with LiteSpeed Cache for performance optimization. The site loads CSS and JS resources from both its own domain and trusted CDNs like cdnjs.cloudflare.com and fonts.googleapis.com. The presence of responsive design elements and viewport meta tags indicates mobile optimization. SEO is supported by meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter Cards, and structured data in JSON-LD format enhances search engine understanding. The site embeds Instagram feeds and Google Maps for social proof and location display. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. Accessibility is basic, with skip links and some ARIA attributes present but no advanced accessibility features detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tills.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tills.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.