Skip to main content

Security report for tigerglobal.com

Tiger Global Management, LLC · Finance · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tiger Global Management, LLC is a well-established investment firm founded in 2001, specializing in long-term investments in leading global public and private companies leveraging technological innovation. The firm operates primarily in the finance sector, offering public equity and private equity investment services. The website presents a professional image with clear business descriptions and investor-focused content, targeting investors, partners, and portfolio companies. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Tag Manager, providing a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and anti-forgery tokens in forms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific statements. WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, though the website content and branding partially mitigate trust issues. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tigerglobal.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
97
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tiger Global holds a strong market position as a global investment firm with over 20 years of experience and a portfolio of more than 90 IPOs across 30 countries. Its business model focuses on public and private equity investments in technology-driven companies. The firm targets institutional investors and partners, emphasizing long-term value creation. The website supports this positioning with investor login access and detailed business descriptions. The absence of WHOIS data is unusual and may indicate privacy protection or registration issues, which should be clarified. The firm does not appear to operate mobile apps or offer investment services online, reducing digital risk exposure. The marketing ecosystem includes Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, but lacks advanced advertising or affiliate programs. Overall, Tiger Global demonstrates a mature, focused investment business with a clear value proposition and professional digital presence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses anti-forgery tokens in its forms, indicating basic security hygiene. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact emails are provided. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism despite using Google Tag Manager tracking raises privacy compliance concerns. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate, reflecting good baseline practices but room for improvement in transparency and technical controls. The missing WHOIS data also reduces trust in domain legitimacy, which is a security consideration. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational site but should be enhanced for compliance and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and inform users about tracking.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to enhance trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimizations to improve user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tiger Global Management, LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tiger Global Management, LLC
Description
Tiger Global is an investment firm pursuing a long-term approach to investing in leading, global public and private companies that leverage technological innovation.
Key services
Public equity investment, Private equity investment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, AOS (Animate On Scroll), FontAwesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL https://)
  • Anti-forgery token in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a .com domain.
  3. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking.
  5. Contact information is limited to email and physical address; no phone numbers found.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Privacy policy is present but basic; no GDPR compliance statements.
  8. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. Website content is professional and consistent with an investment firm.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, and AOS for animations. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and tracking. The site is built on ASP.NET Web Forms technology, indicated by the presence of __VIEWSTATE and __EVENTTARGET hidden fields. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive meta viewport settings and mobile navigation menus. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident from the HTML. The site lacks advanced SEO meta tags and accessibility attributes, suggesting opportunities for technical improvements. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable and professional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tigerglobal.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tigerglobal.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.