Skip to main content

Security report for tiamo.lv

Tiamo Grupa · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tiamo Grupa is a well-established hospitality group based in Latvia, primarily operating in Liepāja and expanding to other Latvian cities. The company manages multiple restaurant and cafe brands, offering a wide range of services including food delivery, event catering, business lunches, and group dining. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content targeted at local customers seeking quality hospitality experiences. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, ensuring a good user experience and SEO optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and explicit GDPR compliance reduces the overall security and privacy score. Contact information is clearly presented, including emails, phone number, physical address, and a detailed contact form collecting personal data with consent. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence suitable for a medium-sized hospitality business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tiamo.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in Latvia's hospitality sector, operating multiple subsidiary brands that cater to diverse customer needs. Their business model focuses on both dine-in and off-site catering services, supported by a professional team and active marketing via social media. The presence of a news section with recent updates indicates ongoing growth and engagement with customers. The use of WordPress and popular plugins suggests a cost-effective yet scalable digital infrastructure. The company appears to prioritize customer experience and event services, which are key revenue drivers. No direct evidence of parent company or external partnerships beyond social media was found.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google Tag Manager and Analytics scripts loaded asynchronously, which is good practice. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The contact form collects sensitive personal data with a consent checkbox, but there is no visible security or privacy policy detailing data protection measures or incident response. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing additional headers, explicit privacy compliance, and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and inform users about tracking.
  3. Update the privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data protection practices.
  4. Create a dedicated security policy and incident response page with contact details for reporting security issues.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA TIAMO GRUPA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tiamo Grupa
Description
Tiamo is one of Latvia's largest hospitality groups offering excellent service, a refined offer, and care in every detail. They operate cafes and restaurants primarily in Liepāja and other locations in Latvia, providing catering, event services, and food delivery.
Key services
Food delivery, On-site banquets, Off-site banquets, Mobile trade, Business lunches, Table reservations, Events, Group catering
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.26, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap 3/4, Slick Slider, Yoast SEO, Ninja Forms, WPBakery Page Builder, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with async loading
  • No visible exposed credentials

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found despite GDPR relevance.
  3. Privacy policy page exists but lacks explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Contact form collects personal data including name, phone, birth date, email, city with consent checkbox.
  5. Multiple hospitality brands under one group are presented with individual links.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO plugins indicates good digital maturity.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  8. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  10. No security headers detected in provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.9.26 with plugins such as Yoast SEO, Ninja Forms, and WPBakery Page Builder, indicating a mature but somewhat dated CMS version. The front-end uses Bootstrap for responsive design and Slick Slider for galleries. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for tracking. The site loads scripts asynchronously to improve performance. The HTML is valid and well-structured, with meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social sharing. Mobile optimization is good, and navigation is clear. However, the WordPress version is outdated, which may pose security risks. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by updating software and optimizing assets.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tiamo.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tiamo.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.