Skip to main content

Security report for ths.lv

Tokyo HS · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tokyo HS is a small local beauty and hair studio based in Riga, Latvia, offering services such as beauty rituals and LPG procedures. The website is multilingual, supporting Latvian, Russian, and English, and is built on WordPress with common plugins and technologies such as jQuery and Google Maps API. The site provides basic contact information including email, phone, and physical address, and links to social media profiles on Facebook and Instagram. However, the website lacks critical compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies, and no WHOIS data could be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Technically, the site uses HTTPS but lacks security headers and advanced security measures, indicating a moderate security posture. Overall, the site is functional but basic in content quality and technical sophistication.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ths.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, specifically in beauty and wellness services, targeting local consumers in Riga. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on personal care treatments. The website's multilingual support suggests an intent to reach a broader regional audience. The lack of detailed business registration or certification information limits deeper business intelligence. Social media presence supports marketing efforts but no advanced analytics or advertising tools are detected. The company appears to be a small independent entity without visible parent or subsidiary relationships.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but no security headers detected. There are no visible forms or data collection points that might require enhanced security controls. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The lack of WHOIS data reduces the ability to verify domain legitimacy. Recommendations include implementing security headers, adding privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  3. Add explicit security and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
  5. Consider adding analytics and monitoring tools with privacy-respecting configurations to improve business insights.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tokyo HS
Description
Tokyo HS is a beauty and hair studio offering beauty rituals and LPG procedures, targeting customers interested in personal care and beauty treatments. The website content is primarily in Latvian with language options for Russian and English.
Key services
LPG Procedures, Beauty rituals
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Maps API
Frameworks
qTranslate-X (multilingual plugin)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based beauty studio site with multilingual support
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact info is present but limited to email, phone, and address
  4. No forms detected on the main page
  5. No security headers detected
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  9. No WAF or blocking detected, site fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with jQuery and Google Maps API integration. It uses the qTranslate-X plugin for multilingual support. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and jQuery CDN. Performance is moderate with no evident optimization for mobile beyond basic viewport settings. Accessibility features are minimal. SEO optimization is poor, with meta robots set to noindex, nofollow, limiting search engine visibility. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site lacks advanced technical security measures such as security headers or CSP. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ths.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ths.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.