Skip to main content

Security report for thoraxregister.de

Deutsches Thoraxregister · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Deutsches Thoraxregister website serves as an interdisciplinary benchmarking project under the patronage of the DGAI and DGT, focusing on thoracic surgery and anesthesia in Germany. It provides an online portal for data entry and benchmarking, targeting medical professionals, patients, and participants in the registry. The site is built on Joomla CMS with a healthcare-oriented template and integrates modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Font Awesome. Matomo analytics is used with privacy-conscious settings, avoiding tracking cookies. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and provides clear contact and legal information, supporting trust and credibility. However, explicit security policies and headers are not evident, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thoraxregister.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
28
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention thoraxregister.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for thoraxregister.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Deutsches Thoraxregister operates as a specialized non-profit medical registry focused on perioperative quality in thoracic surgery. Its market position is niche but important within the German healthcare sector, supported by recognized medical societies (DGAI and DGT). The business model revolves around data collection, benchmarking, and research facilitation. The target audience includes hospitals, physicians, and patients interested in thoracic care quality. The website supports participant engagement through an online portal and provides updated documentation and news. The partnership with medical societies enhances credibility and domain expertise. Growth potential lies in expanding registry participation and research output.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Matomo analytics configured to avoid tracking cookies, demonstrating good privacy respect. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to enhance security posture. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The absence of forms on the main site reduces attack surface, but the external data entry portal's security is unknown. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and policy transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to increase transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly update Joomla CMS and all plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Deutsches Thoraxregister
Description
Das Deutsche Thoraxregister ist ein interdisziplinäres Benchmark-Projekt unter der Schirmherrschaft der DGAI und DGT.
Key services
Erhebung der perioperativen Behandlungsqualität, Online-Dateneingabeportal, Benchmarking, Registerforschung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla!, Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Owl Carousel, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap, T3 Framework (Joomla template)
Platforms
Joomla CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No tracking cookies used by Matomo
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in German and targeted at medical professionals and patients.
  3. Uses Joomla CMS with a healthcare-focused template.
  4. Includes clear contact information and legal pages.
  5. Implements cookie consent and uses Matomo analytics without tracking cookies.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; could be improved.
  7. No forms detected in the provided HTML content; data input is via external portal.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the main HTML content.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature CMS platform (Joomla) with a healthcare-focused template and integrates popular front-end frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery. The use of Owl Carousel and Font Awesome enhances UI/UX. Matomo analytics is self-hosted and configured for privacy. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected but could benefit from optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO meta tags are properly set. No broken elements or errors were observed in the provided content. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modern security enhancements and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thoraxregister.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thoraxregister.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.