Skip to main content

Security report for thisisspiro.com

Spiro · Media · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spiro is a global experiential marketing agency specializing in uniting strategic creative with advanced digital solutions to create immersive brand experiences. Positioned as an innovative leader in the media sector, Spiro offers services including strategy and planning, events and experiences, digital mixed media, and custom exhibits. Their target audience comprises brands and enterprises seeking to engage customers through live and digital activations. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with a strong portfolio of high-profile clients, indicating a medium-sized enterprise based in the United States. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern front-end frameworks such as Foundation and Motion UI. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Marketo, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, and others, demonstrating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility features, though some accessibility improvements could be made. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reputable third-party scripts. However, there is a lack of visible security headers and no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, as it is inconsistent with the active and professional nature of the website. This discrepancy suggests possible WHOIS privacy protection or data unavailability but warrants caution. Overall, Spiro presents a credible and professional online presence with strong business and technical foundations. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and addressing the WHOIS data gap to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thisisspiro.com

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
85
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Spiro operates in the experiential marketing and media sector, targeting global brands seeking innovative customer engagement solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in combining strategic creativity with advanced digital technologies to deliver immersive experiences. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on high-value marketing activations and custom exhibits. Revenue streams likely include project-based contracts and ongoing digital marketing services. The company demonstrates growth potential through a diverse client portfolio and active social media engagement. Partnerships with major brands and use of advanced marketing tools indicate a sophisticated operational ecosystem. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a minor risk factor but does not currently undermine the company's market position.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data detected. Integration of multiple tracking and marketing scripts is managed through reputable providers, reducing risk. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a vulnerability that could expose the site to clickjacking or content injection attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are publicly available, limiting transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and formalizing incident response processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, including a security.txt file, to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards, improving usability and compliance.
  5. Address the WHOIS data absence by ensuring domain registration information is accurate and publicly available or justified by privacy policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Spiro
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spiro
Description
Our global activation agency unites strategic creative with advanced digital solutions, bonding your brand community to customers throughout any space and time.
Key services
Strategy & Planning, Events & Experiences, Digital & Mixed Media, Custom Exhibits
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Vimeo embed, Google Tag Manager, Marketo, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, ZoomInfo Pixel, CookieYes Consent
Frameworks
Foundation, Motion UI
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts from reputable sources

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity, Marketo Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, ZoomInfo Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Twitter Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, ZoomInfo Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Marketo, CookieYes Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Professional design and clear navigation structure.
  3. Comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms policies present.
  4. Multiple marketing and analytics tools integrated.
  5. No signs of adult or explicit content.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual for an active commercial site.
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  8. Contact information includes phone number and physical address in Nevada, USA.
  9. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Instagram, and Facebook.
  10. Use of WordPress CMS with modern front-end frameworks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including Foundation and Motion UI frameworks. It uses jQuery and integrates multimedia content via Vimeo embeds. The site employs multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Marketo, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Tag, and ZoomInfo Pixel, indicating a sophisticated digital marketing infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, the lack of visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and professional design, supporting a positive user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thisisspiro.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thisisspiro.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.