Skip to main content

Security report for thinkpr.dk

Think PR · Media · Denmark

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Think PR is a creative communications, public relations, and social media agency operating since 2006, primarily serving businesses seeking PR and social media services. The website is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as Yoast SEO and WP Rocket, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity and performance optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, and no explicit security or privacy policies are published. Overall, the site presents a professional image but could improve transparency and compliance by publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies and enhancing security configurations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thinkpr.dk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention thinkpr.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
33%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for thinkpr.dk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialized agency in the media sector, focusing on creative communications and social media management. The business model is service-oriented, targeting organizations needing PR and digital communications. The domain age and consistent WHOIS data support the legitimacy and established market presence. However, the absence of visible contact details and trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials limits the perceived credibility. The marketing ecosystem includes SEO and performance tools but lacks evident analytics or advanced tracking.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers that could mitigate common web threats. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available, which may hinder security transparency and responsiveness. The cookie consent mechanism is present, indicating some privacy compliance effort. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better policy publication and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve security transparency.
  5. Include clear contact information and trust indicators to enhance business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Think PR
Description
Think PR is a creative communications, public relations, and social media agency offering services in these domains.
Key services
Creative Communications, Public Relations, Social Media Management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Fonts, WordPress, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of WP Rocket for performance and some security enhancements

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CleanTalk
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, WP Rocket
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based PR and communications agency site.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is present and active.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  6. HTTPS is enabled and appears properly configured.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled for the domain.
  8. Use of modern fonts and performance optimization plugins like WP Rocket.
  9. No obvious security headers detected in the provided data.
  10. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, leveraging popular plugins like Yoast SEO for search optimization and WP Rocket for caching and performance. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts with preconnect and preload optimizations. The site shows good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and technical SEO. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were identified in the provided content. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and more comprehensive privacy and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thinkpr.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thinkpr.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.