Skip to main content

Security report for thieme.de

Thieme Gruppe · Healthcare · Germany

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Thieme Gruppe operates as a prominent digital healthcare information provider based in Germany, focusing on improving medicine and health through reliable, quality-assured medical content and digital health services. The website targets healthcare professionals including doctors, nurses, students, authors, and journalists, offering AI-based decision support and various portals. The company holds an ISO/IEC 27001 certification, underscoring its commitment to information security. Technically, the website is built on the Scrivito CMS platform, employs modern web technologies, and integrates OneTrust for cookie consent management, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and an established ISMS, though some security headers and explicit incident response contacts are missing. Overall, the site is professional, well-branded, and trustworthy, though WHOIS data is unavailable, slightly reducing transparency. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit privacy and terms pages, enhancing contact visibility, and adding security.txt for vulnerability disclosures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of thieme.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      DMARC not enforcing

      DMARC policy is set to "none"

      What to do: Gradually move to "quarantine" then "reject" policy

    • Medium

      No DKIM record found

      DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

      What to do: Configure DKIM with your email provider

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

Keep watching thieme.de

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Thieme Gruppe holds a strong market position in the healthcare sector as a digital health information provider. Its business model centers on delivering quality medical content and digital services to healthcare professionals, leveraging AI for decision support. The company likely generates revenue through content subscriptions, digital services, and publishing. The target audience is specialized and professional, including medical practitioners and related stakeholders. The presence of ISO 27001 certification and professional website design indicates a mature organization with a focus on compliance and security. The website links to related domains such as shop.thieme.de and careers.thieme.com, suggesting a broader ecosystem. Growth indicators include adoption of AI technologies and digital health portals. No suspicious domains or partners were detected.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a high security maturity level, evidenced by ISO/IEC 27001 certification and HTTPS enforcement. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a minor gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Incident response information and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, which could be improved. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve incident response transparency.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  5. Enhance visibility of company contact details such as phone numbers and physical addresses to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Thieme Gruppe
Description
Für eine bessere Medizin und mehr Gesundheit im Leben setzt sich Thieme Tag für Tag ein. Anliegen des digitalen Gesundheitsdienstleister ist es, Medizin und Versorgungsprozesse so zu gestalten, dass sie sich im Interesse der Menschen nachhaltig weiterentwickeln und verbessern.
Key services
Medical information services, Digital health services, Publishing and portals, AI-based decision support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Scrivito CMS, OneTrust cookie consent, Bootstrap CSS, SVG graphics
Frameworks
Scrivito
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ISO/IEC 27001 certified ISMS
  • Cookie consent via OneTrust

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
OneTrust
Marketing tools
OneTrust cookie consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in German language.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. Strong focus on healthcare information and digital health services.
  4. ISO/IEC 27001 certification prominently mentioned, indicating strong security posture.
  5. Cookie consent implemented via OneTrust with clear user controls.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content.
  7. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML snippet.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
  9. Website uses Scrivito CMS and modern web technologies.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Scrivito CMS, a modern cloud-based content management system, and integrates OneTrust for cookie consent management. The use of SVG graphics and Bootstrap CSS indicates a contemporary front-end design approach. Preconnect hints to api.scrivito.com and cdn0.scrvt.com suggest optimized resource loading. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features and SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading of images. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely cloud-based given the CMS and CDN usage. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and add structured data for enhanced SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thieme.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thieme.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.