Skip to main content

Security report for thieme.com

Thieme Group · Healthcare · United States

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Thieme Group is a well-established healthcare publishing company committed to advancing medicine and healthcare through timely and relevant information. The company targets medical professionals, researchers, and educators, offering a blend of traditional publishing and digital healthcare solutions. Their market position is strengthened by a family-owned business model with a growing focus on technology and digital transformation. Technically, the website is built on the Scrivito CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies and providing a responsive, accessible, and SEO-optimized experience. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, employs security headers, and integrates cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks a publicly visible security policy or vulnerability disclosure program. The absence of WHOIS data reduces trust slightly but does not detract significantly from the overall professional presentation and compliance posture. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response policies, adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and improving transparency around domain registration details.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of thieme.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      DMARC not enforcing

      DMARC policy is set to "none"

      What to do: Gradually move to "quarantine" then "reject" policy

    • Medium

      No DKIM record found

      DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

      What to do: Configure DKIM with your email provider

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

Keep watching thieme.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Thieme operates in the healthcare and technology sectors, focusing on medical publishing and digital healthcare services. Their business model revolves around providing authoritative medical content and digital tools to healthcare professionals worldwide. The company benefits from a strong brand, consistent messaging, and a global reach, supported by dedicated partner domains for e-commerce and careers. Growth indicators include recent executive appointments emphasizing technology leadership. The partnership ecosystem includes specialized domains for commerce and recruitment, enhancing operational efficiency. Thieme's competitive advantage lies in its blend of traditional publishing expertise and digital innovation, positioning it well in the evolving healthcare information market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and cookie consent compliance aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and vulnerability disclosure program indicates room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, and forms appear secure. The lack of incident response contact details may hinder rapid communication in case of security events. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve communication channels.
  4. Enhance WHOIS transparency or provide domain registration details to improve trust.
  5. Continue to monitor and update cookie and privacy compliance to maintain GDPR adherence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Thieme Group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Thieme Group
Description
Thieme is committed to better medicine and a healthier life - day after day. With the key information at the right time and in the right place, Thieme improves health and healthcare.
Key services
Medical publishing, Digital healthcare solutions, Scientific research dissemination
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Scrivito CMS, Bootstrap, OneTrust cookie consent, SVG graphics
Frameworks
React (implied by Scrivito usage)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
OneTrust
Marketing tools
OneTrust cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. Professional healthcare publishing focus.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance.
  4. No security policy or incident response info publicly available.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly privacy protected or unregistered domain record.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Scrivito CMS platform, utilizing modern web standards including SVG graphics and Bootstrap for responsive design. It integrates OneTrust for cookie consent management, ensuring privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed through meta tags and Open Graph data. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced transparency on hosting and security frameworks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thieme.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thieme.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.