Skip to main content

Security report for thestreet.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website thestreet.com appears to be a long-established media domain, likely focused on financial news or related content given the domain name and industry classification. However, the provided HTML content is inaccessible due to a bot protection mechanism implemented via an iframe from captcha-delivery.com, which blocks direct content access and analysis. This prevents extraction of metadata, contact information, policies, or business descriptions. The domain is registered with Amazon Registrar, Inc. since 1997, indicating legitimacy and a mature online presence. The lack of accessible content limits the ability to assess technical infrastructure, security posture, or compliance status in detail. Technically, the site uses JavaScript and is hosted on infrastructure associated with Amazon. The presence of a bot protection iframe suggests a focus on mitigating automated access or scraping, which is common for media and financial news sites. Due to the blocking, no security headers or SSL details could be confirmed, nor could privacy or cookie policies be identified. From a security perspective, the domain registration status flags clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, and clientUpdateProhibited indicate good domain ownership protection practices. No suspicious WHOIS patterns were found. However, the inability to access the site content means no direct security or privacy compliance evaluation is possible. The content safety rating is safe based on domain context and absence of adult or explicit content indicators. Overall, the site is legitimate and likely professional, but the current bot protection limits external analysis. Strategic recommendations include enabling a more accessible version for security and compliance audits, publishing clear privacy and cookie policies, and providing visible contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thestreet.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Thestreet.com operates in the media sector, likely providing financial news and market analysis. The domain age and registrar data support a mature business presence. The business model is presumably advertising and subscription-based content delivery, targeting investors, financial professionals, and the general public interested in market news. No direct information on partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies was found in the provided content. The site likely competes in a crowded financial news market, leveraging brand recognition from its long domain history. Growth indicators and revenue streams cannot be assessed due to content inaccessibility.

Security posture

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the WAF/bot protection blocking content access. Domain registration protections are strong, and the use of a bot protection iframe suggests an active security approach to prevent automated abuse. No security headers or SSL configuration details were available for review. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies were found. Compliance with GDPR or other frameworks cannot be confirmed. The security score is low due to lack of accessible data, but no direct vulnerabilities or risks were identified from the WHOIS data.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a security audit-friendly access mode or provide security researchers with a bypass to analyze site content and policies.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Expose contact information including security incident response contacts to enhance transparency and incident handling.
  4. Review and publish security headers and SSL configuration details to improve security posture and external trust.
  5. Consider adding vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website content is blocked by a security mechanism (captcha-delivery.com iframe) indicating a WAF or bot protection challenge page. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Stack
JavaScript

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to a bot protection iframe from captcha-delivery.com.
  2. No visible metadata, forms, or contact information in the provided HTML content.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected in the provided content.
  4. WHOIS data shows a long-established domain with standard domain status protections.
  5. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from the provided data.
  6. No explicit business or contact information found in the HTML content.
  7. Content safety rating is safe based on domain and known business type.
  8. Technical and content quality assessments are blocked due to lack of accessible content.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses JavaScript and is hosted on Amazon infrastructure, indicating a modern and scalable technical foundation. The presence of a bot protection iframe suggests advanced security controls to mitigate scraping and automated attacks. However, the blocking prevents assessment of CMS usage, SEO optimization, accessibility, or performance metrics. No metadata or structured data was found in the provided HTML snippet. The domain is well protected with registrar status flags. Technical debt or modernization needs cannot be evaluated due to lack of content access.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thestreet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thestreet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.