Skip to main content

Security report for thepornblender.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Porn Blender is an adult content directory and review website that curates lists of the best and free porn sites for 2025. The site targets adult users seeking curated pornographic content and operates primarily through affiliate marketing and advertising. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and integrates multiple third-party analytics and tracking services such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Algolia Search Insights. The site is accessible without any WAF or security challenge blocking, and it appears to be mobile optimized with good navigation and content relevance. However, the security posture is moderate with no visible security headers or advanced protections, and privacy compliance is poor due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. The lack of WHOIS registration data and contact information reduces business credibility and trustworthiness. Overall, the site functions well as a niche adult media directory but lacks transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: hxsjzagraj3qffn3nydngrffaw54c2l6267r4pqh4m5aaxficjca.mx-verification.google.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thepornblender.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
75
Email security
75
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult media sector, focusing on providing curated porn site listings and reviews. Its business model relies on affiliate marketing and advertising revenue. The site targets adult consumers looking for trusted recommendations in the adult content space. Market positioning is niche with moderate branding consistency and good content quality. The absence of company registration or contact details limits its perceived legitimacy. The site leverages partnerships with adult platforms as indicated by verification meta tags but does not disclose formal partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the available data.

Security posture

The security maturity of the site is basic to moderate. HTTPS is implied but SSL configuration details are unavailable. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The site uses multiple third-party scripts, increasing the attack surface, but no vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is lacking, with no visible privacy or cookie policies and no GDPR compliance indicators. Incident response and security policy information are absent. The site would benefit from implementing security best practices and transparency measures to improve trust and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  3. Publish contact information including security incident response contacts.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Porn Blender is a website that provides curated lists and reviews of pornographic websites, including best porn sites and free porn sites for the year 2025.
Key services
Porn site listings, Porn site reviews, Affiliate links to porn sites
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Algolia Search Insights, WordPress (implied by wp-content URLs and plugins)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Algolia Search Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content directory and review site.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, domain may be unregistered or privacy protected.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  5. Uses multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  7. Site content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  8. Site uses WordPress CMS with custom scripts and plugins.
  9. Site includes meta tags for adult content rating and site verification for adult platforms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS and uses a modern JavaScript stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Algolia Search Insights for analytics and search functionality. The site appears to have moderate performance and good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data for breadcrumbs. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or hosting provider details. The site uses lazy loading and script optimization techniques. Technical debt is moderate due to missing security headers and privacy compliance features. Modernization opportunities include enhanced security and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thepornblender.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thepornblender.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.