Skip to main content

Security report for themilk.lt

milk · Media · Lithuania

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Milk is a creative agency specializing in storytelling across digital and traditional media platforms, including Instagram stories and TV commercials. The company positions itself as a niche player in the creative media industry, emphasizing the return of creativity in marketing. The website is built on the Squarespace platform, leveraging modern web technologies and integrating analytics and social media SDKs to support marketing efforts. While the site is professionally designed and mobile-optimized, it lacks direct contact information and advanced security headers, which slightly diminish its trustworthiness. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable or invalid, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy. Overall, Milk presents a solid creative business front but should improve transparency and security practices to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching themilk.lt

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
55
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention themilk.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
28
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
28
Weak passwords
43%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for themilk.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Milk operates in the media sector as a small-sized creative agency focused on storytelling services. Its business model revolves around content creation for social media and television, targeting clients who value creative marketing solutions. The company maintains an active social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn, which supports its brand visibility. The absence of detailed business registration information and contact details on the website limits external verification of its corporate status. The use of Squarespace indicates a preference for managed hosting and ease of content management. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website data.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks several important security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are critical for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No forms were detected, reducing the attack surface related to input handling. The cookie consent banner indicates awareness of privacy regulations, but the absence of a security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency in security governance. The invalid WHOIS response for the domain is a significant concern, as it impairs trust in domain ownership and registration legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in header implementation and domain registration clarity.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and configure HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to enforce HTTPS usage.
  2. Implement a Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header to reduce risks of cross-site scripting and data injection.
  3. Add security headers such as X-Content-Type-Options and Referrer-Policy to enhance browser security.
  4. Publish clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Resolve domain WHOIS issues to ensure domain registration data is valid and transparent.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
milk
Description
Despite living in an age where algorithms and cold logic rule the roost, we’re sticking to our creative guns. Our forte is storytelling. Be it Instagram stories or the classical 30s stories on TV, at Milk we believe in the inevitable return of creativity and the substantial return on it.
Key services
Storytelling, Instagram stories, TV commercials
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, jQuery
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (via Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace platform
  2. Content is professionally presented with focus on creative storytelling
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable or invalid for this domain
  7. No advanced security headers detected, but HTTPS is enforced
  8. Social media links to Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn are present
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML content
  10. Tracking scripts for Google Analytics and Facebook SDK are present
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Squarespace, utilizing its built-in CMS and hosting infrastructure. It uses common web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook SDK for tracking and social media integration. The site is mobile-optimized and uses modern fonts from Google Fonts. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced performance optimizations detected. Accessibility features are basic, with no explicit ARIA roles or advanced accessibility markup observed. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The lack of advanced security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that should be addressed to improve overall site robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with themilk.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review themilk.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.