The Great Discontent is a niche media brand established in 2011 that focuses on interviews with artists, makers, and risk-takers. It operates through multiple channels including a print magazine, online magazine, live events, podcasts, and an online shop. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. The site is well-branded and targets a creative audience, positioning itself as a trusted source of creative storytelling and inspiration. Technically, the site is hosted with DNS managed by Cloudflare and registered via GoDaddy, with HTTPS enabled and basic SEO optimizations in place. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and security headers are not explicitly detected, which could be improved to enhance security posture. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which is a gap for GDPR and other regulations. Analytics usage is moderate, relying on Google Analytics and Tag Manager. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
63
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention thegreatdiscontent.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for thegreatdiscontent.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The Great Discontent operates in the media sector with a focus on creative professionals and enthusiasts. Its business model includes content publishing, events, podcasts, and merchandise sales. The brand has a consistent identity and a loyal niche audience. The domain age and registration details support its legitimacy and market presence. The company leverages social media for audience engagement but lacks visible direct contact information or formal policies on the website, which may limit transparency. There is no indication of large-scale enterprise operations, suggesting a small to medium-sized business with a focused market approach.
Security posture
The website uses HTTPS and has domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no advanced security headers were detected, which are recommended best practices. There is no evidence of a published security policy or incident response plan. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. The security posture is adequate for a small media site but should be improved to meet higher compliance and security standards.
Recommendations
Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance browser security.
Provide clear contact information including security or abuse contacts to improve incident response readiness.
Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics to minimize privacy risks and improve user trust.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
The Great Discontent
Description
Own your discontent. Interviews with artists, makers & risk-takers via print & online mag, live event series & podcast.
Key services
Print magazine, Online magazine, Live event series, Podcast, Merchandise shop
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, JetMenu, JetEngine, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is a professionally designed WordPress site using Elementor and Yoast SEO.
Content is rich with interviews and media focused on creative professionals.
No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or main navigation.
No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter (X), and Instagram links.
Security posture is adequate but could be improved with DNSSEC and security headers.
Analytics usage includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager.
No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is fully accessible.
No adult or NSFW content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and widely supported technology stack. It uses Cloudflare for DNS management but does not have DNSSEC enabled. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted third parties like Google Analytics and Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA attributes. Performance is moderate with no obvious blocking issues. The site lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy mechanisms, which are areas for technical improvement.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with thegreatdiscontent.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thegreatdiscontent.com.