Skip to main content

Security report for thefulcrum.us

Bridge Alliance · Media · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Fulcrum is a US-based media platform operated by Bridge Alliance, founded in 2019. It focuses on nonpartisan news, debate, and community engagement aimed at fostering better democracy through bridging political divides. The website offers news content and facilitates cross-partisan dialogue, targeting a general audience interested in political reform and solutions. The platform maintains a consistent brand presence with active social media channels on Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and YouTube. Technically, the site is built on the RebelMouse CMS platform, hosted via GoDaddy, and employs modern JavaScript frameworks and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, with SEO best practices partially implemented. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and bot protection, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thefulcrum.us

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
65
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bridge Alliance operates The Fulcrum as a small media entity positioned in the nonpartisan news and political debate sector. The business model revolves around content publishing and community engagement without evident e-commerce or subscription services on the homepage. The platform leverages advertising networks such as InMobi and tracking tools like Google Analytics for monetization and audience insights. The target market includes politically engaged citizens seeking balanced discourse. The company shows no signs of subsidiaries or parent companies. Growth potential lies in expanding content offerings and improving compliance and security to build greater trust. Partnerships with advertising and analytics providers support its revenue streams.

Security posture

The Fulcrum demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No public vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The site should prioritize publishing privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, and adding security headers to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve overall DNS security.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Add standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and security culture.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bridge Alliance
Description
News. Debate. Community. Levers for a better democracy.
Key services
news publishing, community engagement, political debate facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA, RebelMouse platform, GoDaddy DNS
Frameworks
RebelMouse
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA used

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
InMobi
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (implied by googletagmanager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a media/news platform focused on nonpartisan political debate and community engagement.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Uses Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or metadata.
  5. Social media presence is established with official Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and YouTube links.
  6. Domain is registered with GoDaddy and has standard domain status protections but lacks DNSSEC.
  7. Site uses RebelMouse CMS platform and integrates advertising and tracking scripts.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL is enabled and presumably valid.
  10. Content is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the RebelMouse CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript bundles and Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation. Hosting is provided by GoDaddy with domain registration consistent with the business entity. The site loads multiple external scripts from advertising and analytics providers, including InMobi and Google Tag Manager. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility features are basic but present. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates some technical debt in security hardening. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thefulcrum.us. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thefulcrum.us.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.