Skip to main content

Security report for thefilmintimes.com

filmin · Media · Spain

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Filmin Times is a niche media platform focused on presenting contemporary European history through cinema. The website offers curated historical film content, timelines, character profiles, and maps, targeting a general audience interested in cultural and historical media. The site is built using modern web technologies including React and Webpack, hosted by OVH sas, and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. The technical infrastructure is modern and mobile-optimized, though performance is moderate and accessibility is basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain protections in place, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent and a privacy policy linked via a partner domain. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy with moderate risk and room for security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thefilmintimes.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention thefilmintimes.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for thefilmintimes.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the media sector, focusing on European history through film, serving a niche audience primarily in Spain but with English language options. It appears to be a small-sized operation founded in 2020, with a partnership or affiliation with filmin.es, a known media platform. The business model centers on content publication and curation rather than direct sales. The presence of partner branding and iframe integration suggests collaboration or content sharing. The site’s market position is specialized, targeting history and cinema enthusiasts. Growth potential lies in expanding content and audience reach. No direct revenue streams or monetization methods are evident from the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain registration includes protective statuses against unauthorized transfer or deletion. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security or incident response policies indicates gaps in security best practices. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the analyzed content. Privacy compliance is basic but present with cookie consent and a privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved to reduce risk and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Create a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and optimize performance to improve user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
filmin
Description
La história contemporánea de Europa contada a través del cine
Key services
historical film content, timeline and map of events, character profiles, media features
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Webpack, Google Analytics
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a media content platform focused on European contemporary history through cinema.
  2. Content is in Spanish with option for English language.
  3. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  4. No visible forms collecting personal data on the main page.
  5. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond cookie and legal notice links.
  6. Uses React framework and modern JavaScript bundling.
  7. Includes Google Analytics for tracking.
  8. No phone numbers or physical addresses found in the content.
  9. Contact email is contacto@filmin.es, consistent with partner domain filmin.es.
  10. Partner branding and logos link to filmin.es, indicating a partnership or affiliation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based front-end with Webpack bundling, indicating a contemporary development approach. Hosting is provided by OVH sas, a reputable provider. Google Analytics is integrated for user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Accessibility is basic, and no advanced technical SEO or structured data beyond meta tags and Open Graph was found. No forms collecting personal data were detected on the main page, reducing attack surface. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thefilmintimes.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thefilmintimes.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.