Skip to main content

Security report for thefappening.wiki

Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf · Media · Iceland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TheFappening.wiki operates as an adult content website specializing in hosting and distributing leaked nude celebrity photos and sex videos. Established in 2015, it targets an adult audience interested in explicit celebrity media, leveraging affiliate marketing through adult webcam services and related partners. The site maintains a basic content presentation with frequent updates but lacks comprehensive privacy and legal compliance documentation. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including jQuery and Google Analytics, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services, but lacks advanced security headers and robust privacy mechanisms. Security posture is weak due to missing headers and absence of GDPR-compliant policies, exposing the site to potential risks and legal scrutiny. Overall, the site presents moderate technical maturity but poor compliance and trustworthiness, with significant risks related to content legality and user privacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thefappening.wiki

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
35
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche in the adult entertainment media sector, focusing on leaked celebrity nude content. Its business model relies heavily on advertising and affiliate marketing, particularly through adult webcam services. The site has a moderate market presence with a large database of celebrity content but lacks transparency in ownership and contact information, relying on privacy-protected WHOIS registration and a generic email contact. Partnerships with known adult content platforms enhance its affiliate revenue streams. Growth potential is limited by legal and ethical challenges inherent in hosting leaked explicit content. The site’s operations appear small-scale but sustained since 2015, indicating a stable but low-profile business.

Security posture

Security maturity is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, increasing exposure to common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Contact information for incident response or abuse reporting is absent, reducing readiness for security incidents. The use of a generic Gmail address for contact further diminishes trust. The site’s content nature poses legal risks, and the absence of clear security policies or certifications highlights a weak security culture. Immediate improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response mechanisms are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish dedicated security incident response contacts and publish related policies.
  4. Replace generic contact email with a verified company domain email to improve credibility.
  5. Conduct legal review of hosted content to mitigate potential copyright and privacy violations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Description
TheFappening is a free nude celebrity website dedicated to the naked celebs apple iPhone leak, where the hottest photos and sex tapes of famous stars and models got released to the internet. Huge pics database updated daily.
Key services
Hosting and sharing nude celebrity photos, Hosting and sharing celebrity sex videos, Affiliate links to webcam services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Google Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts and distributes leaked nude celebrity photos and videos, including explicit content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating poor compliance.
  3. Contact information limited to a single email address (kurineko555@gmail.com) which is a generic Gmail address, reducing credibility.
  4. Multiple external adult content and affiliate links present.
  5. No security headers detected, exposing potential security risks.
  6. Uses Google Analytics extensively without visible privacy compliance.
  7. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional.
  8. WHOIS data shows privacy protection, common for adult content sites.
  9. No social media or official company contact details found.
  10. Website content and business model focus on adult entertainment niche with leaked content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a basic technology stack centered on jQuery 2.2.4 and Google Analytics for tracking. Hosting is managed via Cloudflare DNS with domain registration through NameCheap, Inc. The site lacks a modern CMS or framework indication and shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no evident advanced optimization. The absence of security headers and modern security practices indicates technical debt and potential vulnerabilities. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags. The site would benefit from modernization including adoption of a CMS, improved security configurations, and enhanced user experience features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thefappening.wiki. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thefappening.wiki.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.