THE END OF MEDICINE website is a professionally designed Squarespace site promoting a documentary film available on multiple streaming platforms and physical media. The site targets a general audience interested in health and medical documentary content. The business model focuses on media distribution and promotion. Technically, the site uses Squarespace CMS with embedded Vimeo videos and Google/Typekit fonts, providing a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises legitimacy concerns, although the site content and social media presence suggest a legitimate media project. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and domain registration transparency.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Critical
Unable to retrieve SSL certificate
Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information
What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention theendofmedicine.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for theendofmedicine.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The website occupies a niche media segment focusing on documentary films about medicine. It leverages multiple digital distribution channels including iTunes, Amazon, Google Play, Vimeo, and physical media sales. The target customers are documentary viewers interested in health topics. The site shows consistent branding and professional content but lacks detailed business information such as company registration or contact emails. The partnership ecosystem includes major streaming platforms but no direct business partners or subsidiaries are identified. Growth indicators are limited due to lack of public business data.
Security posture
The site enforces HTTPS, which is a critical security baseline. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site collects user data via newsletter and contact forms but does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. Incident response and security policy information are absent, indicating limited security maturity. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a notable risk factor for trust and legitimacy.
Recommendations
Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
Add security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance web security.
Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
Provide clear business contact information including official emails and phone numbers.
Develop and publish a security incident response plan and related contact channels.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
THE END OF MEDICINE
Description
The website promotes a documentary film titled 'THE END OF MEDICINE' available on multiple streaming platforms and physical media. It targets audiences interested in medical and health-related documentary content.
Key services
Film streaming, Film sales, Information dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Squarespace, Vimeo embed, Google Fonts, Typekit Fonts
Platforms
Squarespace CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is a professionally designed Squarespace site promoting a documentary film.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
Contact is only via a contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers provided.
WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces trust.
No security headers detected in the HTML content.
HTTPS is enabled and enforced.
No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond Squarespace defaults.
Social media presence on Instagram and Facebook is linked.
Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on Squarespace, a modern CMS platform, using embedded Vimeo videos and web fonts from Google Fonts and Adobe Typekit. The site is mobile optimized and loads with moderate performance. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The site lacks advanced technical security configurations such as security headers. Hosting is managed by Squarespace, providing reliable infrastructure. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with additional security and compliance features.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with theendofmedicine.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review theendofmedicine.com.