Skip to main content

Security report for theclimatechoice.com

ClimateChoice · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ClimateChoice is a specialized business-to-business platform focused on providing primary supplier climate data to assist climate and procurement teams in accelerating Scope 3 decarbonization efforts. Founded in 2019, the company positions itself as a niche player in the energy sector, offering data-driven solutions to improve sustainability in supply chains. The website is built using modern front-end technology (Framer) and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as HubSpot, Google Analytics, Posthog, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a mature digital marketing and analytics infrastructure. The presence of a Usercentrics consent management platform demonstrates attention to cookie consent and privacy compliance, although no explicit privacy policy or terms of service were found in the analyzed content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections in place, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers which are recommended for enhanced security. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve transparency by publishing privacy and legal documents and providing clear contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching theclimatechoice.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention theclimatechoice.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for theclimatechoice.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets climate and procurement teams, focusing on Scope 3 decarbonization, which is a growing concern in corporate sustainability. Its business model appears to be a SaaS or data platform offering climate-related data services to enterprises. The domain age and registration details align well with the company's founding year, supporting legitimacy. The use of advanced marketing and analytics tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and engagement. However, the lack of visible contact details and legal policies on the homepage may limit trust for some users. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the provided data. The company operates in the energy sector with a small organizational size inferred from domain age and content scope.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses a reputable domain registrar with standard domain status protections. Cookie consent is managed via Usercentrics, indicating compliance efforts. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice to prevent DNS spoofing. No explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected in the HTML content, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No forms or input fields were found in the analyzed content, reducing immediate risk of injection attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which is a gap in security transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional technical controls and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common web attacks.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ClimateChoice
Description
Built for climate & procurement teams to jointly accelerate Scope 3 decarbonization.
Key services
Primary supplier climate data, Scope 3 decarbonization acceleration
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer (site generator), Google Analytics, HubSpot (analytics, leadflows, forms, live chat), Posthog (self-hosted analytics), Facebook Pixel, Usercentrics (consent management)
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Usercentrics CMP for cookie consent
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Posthog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Posthog, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern front-end technology (Framer).
  2. Strong use of marketing and analytics tools (HubSpot, Google Analytics, Posthog).
  3. Cookie consent managed via Usercentrics CMP.
  4. No visible contact information or legal documents like privacy policy or terms of service on the homepage HTML.
  5. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  6. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. Domain registration is consistent and transparent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Framer, a modern web design and prototyping tool, indicating a contemporary front-end approach. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing platforms including HubSpot, Google Analytics, Posthog, and Facebook Pixel, showing a sophisticated marketing stack. The domain is registered with Amazon Registrar, Inc. and uses AWS DNS servers, suggesting reliable hosting infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates some technical debt in security hardening. No CMS beyond Framer was detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and more comprehensive legal content integration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with theclimatechoice.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review theclimatechoice.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.