Skip to main content

Security report for thebigfish.hu

Bigfish · Hospitality · Hungary

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bigfish is a well-established seafood bistro and market located in Budapest, Hungary, founded in 2013. It offers a unique fusion of a fish market and a casual dining experience with a broad selection of fresh seafood and related dishes. The business targets seafood enthusiasts, local residents, and tourists seeking high-quality seafood in a vibrant urban setting. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor, with modern JavaScript libraries and integrations such as Google Maps and PixelYourSite for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and some best practices but lacks visible security headers, privacy policies, and incident response information, which are areas for improvement. The domain registration data aligns well with the business profile, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional and credible but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thebigfish.hu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention thebigfish.hu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for thebigfish.hu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bigfish holds a strong market position as Budapest's iconic seafood bistro with the largest seafood selection in Hungary. Its business model combines retail seafood sales with hospitality services, leveraging partnerships with seafood suppliers and reservation platforms. The company targets a diverse customer base including families, tourists, and urban diners. The website reflects a mature digital presence with integrated marketing and analytics tools, though it lacks some compliance elements. The partnership ecosystem includes fishmonger.hu as a supplier and sevenrooms.com for reservations, indicating a well-connected operational model. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts without visible consent mechanisms raises privacy compliance concerns. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security headers, privacy policies, and incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a visible security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks and improve privacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bigfish
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bigfish
Description
Bigfish is a Budapest-based iconic seafood bistro established in 2013, combining a fish market and a casual, relaxed restaurant atmosphere. It offers a wide variety of fresh seafood including oysters, caviar, live lobster, sushi, sashimi, and classic Hungarian fish dishes in a vibrant urban setting on Andrássy út.
Key services
Seafood market, Casual dining restaurant, Fresh oyster and caviar selection, Live lobster, sushi, sashimi, Classic Hungarian fish dishes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Maps API, PixelYourSite plugin
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce for AJAX requests

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear branding and consistent content.
  2. No visible privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Extensive use of tracking and analytics scripts without visible consent mechanisms.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. No security policy or incident response information is published.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  7. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor builder and common JS libraries.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
  9. Social media presence includes Instagram link.
  10. External partners include fishmonger.hu (supplier) and sevenrooms.com (reservation system).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder, supported by jQuery and Google Maps API. It integrates marketing and analytics tools including Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics via the PixelYourSite plugin. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. Performance is moderate, with some optimization possible. The technical stack is standard for hospitality websites but lacks advanced security configurations such as security headers. The site uses nonce tokens for AJAX requests, indicating some security awareness. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thebigfish.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thebigfish.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.