Skip to main content

Security report for thebeliever.net

Believer Magazine · Media · N/a

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Believer Magazine operates as a niche literary and cultural publication, delivering editorial content focused on literature and arts. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce integration, indicating a digital maturity that supports both content delivery and e-commerce functionalities. The site employs common web technologies and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, reflecting a standard approach to user engagement and marketing. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of visible security headers and lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies indicate areas for improvement in security posture and compliance. The WHOIS data is unavailable or not found, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency and trustworthiness. Overall, the website presents a professional and consistent user experience with good content quality and navigation. The security and privacy compliance aspects require enhancement to meet best practices and regulatory standards. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, publishing security incident response procedures, and improving security headers to strengthen the site's defense and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching thebeliever.net

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Believer Magazine targets readers interested in literary and cultural topics, positioning itself as a specialized media outlet. Its business model combines content publication with e-commerce, likely generating revenue through subscriptions and merchandise sales. The use of WordPress and WooCommerce suggests a cost-effective and scalable platform choice. The site leverages third-party marketing and analytics tools to optimize audience reach and engagement. However, the lack of publicly available registrant information and privacy documentation may impact credibility with privacy-conscious users and partners.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, protecting data in transit. The lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No sensitive data exposure was detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response information, indicates gaps in compliance and preparedness. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found, but the WHOIS data absence is a concern for domain legitimacy. Enhancing security headers, privacy compliance, and transparency would improve the overall security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a security incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve accessibility features to comply with standards and enhance user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Believer Magazine
Description
Believer Magazine is a publication focused on literary and cultural content, offering articles, essays, and other editorial material.
Key services
Publishing literary and cultural articles, Online magazine content, E-commerce for magazine subscriptions and merchandise
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.9.10, WooCommerce 6.1.2, jQuery 3.6.0, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Yoast SEO, Slick Carousel, Background Adjuster plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Quantcast
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Quantcast
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Constant Contact
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based literary magazine with e-commerce features
  2. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in HTML content
  4. Uses multiple third-party analytics and advertising services
  5. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not found in WHOIS registry
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. Site uses HTTPS with valid certificates
  8. No signs of adult or NSFW content
  9. Site navigation and branding are consistent and professional
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 5.9.10 with WooCommerce 6.1.2, utilizing jQuery and various plugins for UI and marketing functionalities. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking and advertising. The site loads multiple external scripts and stylesheets from reputable CDNs. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with thebeliever.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review thebeliever.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.