Skip to main content

Security report for theaudiencers.com

The Audiencers · Media · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Audiencers is a specialized B2B media community platform founded in 2022, focused on supporting publishing professionals with expertise in audience engagement, conversion, and retention. The platform offers case studies, newsletters, events, and subscription services, positioning itself as a niche player in the media industry. The business is linked to Poool, a known player in paywall and engagement technology, enhancing its credibility and market positioning. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern tools like Elementor and Kadence Blocks, integrating analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, HubSpot, and Stripe for payments. The site is mobile-optimized and uses structured data for SEO, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and domain transfer protection but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy compliance is partially implemented with a cookie consent mechanism but lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences, with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching theaudiencers.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Audiencers operates in the media sector, targeting publishing professionals seeking to improve audience engagement and monetization strategies. Its business model revolves around subscription-based access to expert content, case studies, and events. The company benefits from its association with Poool, leveraging technology partnerships to enhance its offerings. The platform's growth potential lies in expanding its community and deepening its content and event portfolio. The lack of direct contact information on the main site suggests a focus on community members and subscribers rather than open public sales. The use of multiple marketing and analytics tools indicates a data-driven approach to audience development and retention.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces its defense-in-depth capabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, but the lack of a published privacy policy and incident response contacts represents compliance gaps. The site would benefit from publishing a security policy, incident response contacts, and a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with additional transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  4. Add a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Audiencers
Description
The Audiencers is the B2B media community to support publishing professionals in making better decisions when it comes to engaging, converting and retaining their audiences.
Key services
Case studies, Expertise sharing, Events (Festivals), Newsletter, Subscription services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Kadence Blocks, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot scripts, Poool paywall and engagement scripts, Stripe (payment processing), Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Yoast SEO plugin
Platforms
WordPress hosting, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Poool engagement scripts
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional B2B media community platform focused on audience engagement and retention.
  2. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Kadence Blocks for design.
  3. Implements cookie consent with a clear mechanism and privacy-related scripts.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page or in metadata.
  6. Strong use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and content clarity.
  7. Security posture is good but could be improved with DNSSEC and security headers.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
  9. Multiple external integrations for analytics, marketing, and payment processing.
  10. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and supports business legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor and Kadence Blocks for design flexibility. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot, Stripe, and Poool engagement/paywall scripts, indicating a mature digital marketing and monetization infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate, with some caching and minification evident. Accessibility features are basic but present. The use of Cloudflare DNS and registrar Gandi SAS provides reliable domain management. Opportunities exist to improve security configurations and privacy transparency to reduce technical debt and compliance risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with theaudiencers.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review theaudiencers.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.