Skip to main content

Security report for theadria.com

The Adria · Hospitality · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Adria is a boutique 5-star luxury hotel located in South Kensington, London, offering upscale rooms, suites, dining, wellbeing services, and event hosting. The website presents a professional and polished digital presence with comprehensive content tailored to affluent travelers seeking exclusive hospitality experiences. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern integrations including Google Analytics, Tag Manager, and third-party booking and dining platforms, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, though the absence of security headers and incident response information suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, impacting overall trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing clear security and incident response policies, and resolving domain registration inconsistencies to strengthen credibility and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching theadria.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Adria positions itself as an exclusive boutique hotel with a nostalgic members’ club ambiance, targeting luxury travelers and business clientele in London. Its business model revolves around premium accommodation, personalized dining experiences, wellness amenities, and event services. Partnerships with booking engines like SynXis and dining platforms such as OpenTable indicate a robust ecosystem supporting customer acquisition and service delivery. The website’s consistent branding and high-quality content reinforce its market position. However, the missing WHOIS data could affect customer trust and should be addressed promptly. The company leverages multiple marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and conversion.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, demonstrating baseline security and privacy compliance. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) and lack of publicly available security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate supply chain risks. The domain registration inconsistency is a critical concern that undermines trust and should be rectified to avoid reputational damage.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security policy and incident response information on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and integrations to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Resolve domain WHOIS registration issues to ensure legitimacy and maintain customer trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Adria
Description
The Adria is a 5-star central London hotel with luxury rooms and suites, breakfast and dining services, meeting rooms and private lounges. It is a boutique hotel located in South Kensington offering 22 elegant suites and rooms with luxury amenities, dining options including breakfast and afternoon tea, wellbeing services such as spa and gym, and event hosting facilities.
Key services
Luxury rooms and suites, Breakfast and dining services, Afternoon tea, Wellbeing services (spa, gym, personal training), Event hosting and meeting rooms, 24-hour room service, Free WiFi
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Plyr video player, Fancybox, FastBooking SDK, Triptease integration, Macaron cookie consent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (fb-ga4-dedge-id)
Marketing tools
Triptease, FastBooking SDK, The Hotels Network
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional, well-designed luxury hotel site with comprehensive content.
  2. No WHOIS registration data found, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  3. No security headers detected in HTML source; HTTPS is enabled.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and accessible.
  5. No visible forms collecting user data on the homepage; booking and reservation links redirect to third-party platforms.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active and linked.
  7. Multiple Google Tag Manager containers and tracking scripts are used.
  8. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  9. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available.
  10. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel, Plyr video player, and Fancybox for UI enhancements. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Triptease, and FastBooking SDK, indicating a sophisticated approach to user tracking and conversion optimization. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices in place. The site uses a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, the lack of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience but requires security hardening and domain registration validation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with theadria.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review theadria.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.