Skip to main content

Security report for tf-fs.com

TF Financial Services · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TF Financial Services is a newly established financial services company founded in 2023, specializing in technology-infused CFO partnership and financial consulting aimed at business growth and transformation. The company targets businesses seeking expert financial leadership and transformation support. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Weglot for multilingual capabilities, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies on the site. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image suitable for its niche market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tf-fs.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance sector with a focus on CFO services and financial consulting. Its business model revolves around providing expert financial leadership and technology-driven solutions to support business success and transformation. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise with a clear market positioning as a specialized financial partner. The use of Weglot indicates an intent to serve a multilingual audience, potentially expanding market reach. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication via contact forms. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified. The company demonstrates awareness of GDPR compliance and user privacy, which is critical in financial services.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, which protects against unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, representing an area for improvement. There is no visible security policy or incident response information on the website, and no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present. The site uses common third-party analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and HubSpot, which are integrated with cookie consent mechanisms, supporting privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional technical controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Consider providing direct contact information such as a security or abuse email address to facilitate communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TF Financial Services
Description
TF Financial Services provides technology-driven financial services focused on CFO partnership for business growth and transformation.
Key services
CFO partnership, financial consulting, business growth and transformation support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Weglot, Google Analytics, HubSpot
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional financial services provider with a focus on CFO partnership.
  2. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Weglot for multilingual support.
  3. Includes privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  5. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers publicly listed.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. SSL is properly configured; no obvious security headers detected.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Website performance is moderate; some optimization possible.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor page builder and uses Weglot for multilingual support, indicating a modern and flexible CMS setup. Google Analytics and HubSpot are used for analytics and marketing, integrated with cookie consent banners for GDPR compliance. The site loads scripts asynchronously and uses lazy loading techniques to optimize performance. Hosting is provided by Hosting Concepts B.V., a reputable registrar and hosting provider. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and basic accessibility compliance. However, there is room for improvement in performance optimization and security hardening. The technical stack is appropriate for a small to medium-sized financial services business aiming for professional online presence and international reach.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tf-fs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tf-fs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.