Skip to main content

Security report for teztour.lv

SIA TEZ TOUR (B2C) · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TEZ TOUR Latvia operates as a regional tour operator and travel agency providing a comprehensive range of travel services including hotel bookings, flights (including charter flights), excursions, transfers, and car rentals. The website targets Latvian-speaking customers and travel agents, offering an online platform for searching and booking travel packages. The company positions itself as a trusted and established player in the Latvian travel market with 24/7 customer support and clear policies. Technically, the website uses a mix of legacy and modern web technologies such as jQuery 1.9.1, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and interactive forms. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA implemented, though some security headers are missing and the use of an outdated jQuery version is a concern. Privacy compliance is well addressed with accessible privacy and cookie policies and GDPR compliance indicators. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the website is professional, functional, and trustworthy with room for security improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teztour.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TEZ TOUR Latvia operates in the hospitality and transportation sectors as a medium-sized tour operator. Its business model focuses on providing full travel packages and related services to Latvian tourists and travel agents. The company leverages partnerships, such as the agent portal at agent.teztour.lv, to extend its market reach. The website content and structure indicate a mature digital presence with clear service offerings and customer support. The company emphasizes trust signals such as 24/7 support and clear payment terms. The lack of visible certifications or security policies suggests potential areas for business maturity growth. The company appears well-positioned in the Latvian travel market with a focus on convenience and comprehensive travel solutions.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, which are positive security practices. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.9.1) may expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not properly patched. No security or incident response policies or contacts were found, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate with good baseline protections but room for improvement in headers, library updates, and incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce modern security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata to improve user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA TEZ TOUR (B2C)
Description
TEZ TOUR Latvia is a trusted tour operator offering hotels, flights, excursions, transfers, and car rentals primarily targeting Latvian-speaking customers. They provide travel packages including charter flights and full travel services.
Key services
Tour packages, Flights including charters, Hotel bookings, Excursions, Transfers, Car rentals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot, bxSlider, chosen jQuery plugin, datetimepicker jQuery plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive forms.
  2. Multiple language options (Latvian and Russian) are supported.
  3. Strong focus on travel services with detailed search and booking forms.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Use of older jQuery version may pose security risks.
  9. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of legacy and modern web technologies including jQuery 1.9.1, bxSlider, chosen plugin, datetimepicker, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for Latvian and Russian languages. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted services. No CMS was explicitly detected. The site uses custom JavaScript for search forms and user interactions. The technical stack is functional but would benefit from modernization, especially updating JavaScript libraries and adding security headers. Hosting provider and CMS details are not discernible from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teztour.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teztour.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.