Skip to main content

Security report for teva.sk

Teva Slovakia · Healthcare · Slovakia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Teva Slovakia operates as a pharmaceutical manufacturing and distribution company, specializing in generic, specialty, and over-the-counter medicines. It holds a significant manufacturing facility in Opava producing billions of pharmaceutical units annually, serving over 50 markets including Slovakia. The company emphasizes patient-centric health initiatives and community engagement, positioning itself as a major player in the healthcare sector. The website reflects a professional corporate presence with clear navigation and multilingual support, targeting healthcare professionals and patients alike. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries, cookie consent management via OneTrust, and monitoring tools such as Microsoft Azure Application Insights and Microsoft Clarity, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and monitoring tools in place, though explicit security headers and policies are not prominently published. Privacy compliance is supported by a cookie consent mechanism but lacks visible privacy and terms of service documentation in the provided content. Overall, the domain registration and WHOIS data align well with the corporate identity, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teva.sk

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
88
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Teva Slovakia benefits from its affiliation with the global Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., leveraging a large manufacturing footprint and extensive distribution network. The business model focuses on pharmaceutical production with a strong emphasis on generic and specialty medicines, patient safety, and community health projects. The website content and structure suggest a focus on healthcare professionals and patients, with educational sponsorship and transparent collaboration initiatives. The company maintains a consistent brand image and uses trusted external domains for partnerships and media. The digital presence supports moderate user tracking balanced with privacy compliance, reflecting a responsible approach to data collection. No suspicious or fraudulent patterns are detected, and the domain age and registrant information are consistent with an established enterprise.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and the use of monitoring and analytics tools that can aid in detecting anomalies. Cookie consent is actively managed through OneTrust, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could be addressed to enhance protection against common web attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the site is secure but could improve by publishing security documentation and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  2. Implement and explicitly configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance with GDPR and other regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Teva Slovakia
Description
Teva Slovakia is a pharmaceutical company focused on manufacturing and distributing generic, specialty, and over-the-counter medicines. It operates a large manufacturing plant in Opava producing billions of tablets and capsules annually, serving over 50 markets including Slovakia. The company emphasizes patient-centric initiatives and community health projects.
Key services
Generic medicines, Specialty and biopharmaceutical products, Over-the-counter products, Patient safety and quality assurance, Educational sponsorship and community health programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, jQuery UI 1.13.2, Popper.js, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Microsoft Azure Application Insights, Microsoft Clarity
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of security monitoring tools (Azure Application Insights)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Azure Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent, Azure Application Insights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong use of cookie consent and privacy compliance tools.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided.
  5. Professional corporate design with clear navigation and multilingual support (Slovak).
  6. Use of modern analytics and monitoring tools indicates good digital maturity.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information on the site.
  8. External links mostly to corporate and trusted domains.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, jQuery UI, and Popper.js, combined with OneTrust for cookie consent and Microsoft Azure Application Insights for telemetry and monitoring. The hosting environment appears to be Azure-based, supporting scalability and reliability. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site lacks an explicit CMS indication, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional corporate website with room for modernization in security and privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teva.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teva.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.