Skip to main content

Security report for teva.pl

Teva · Healthcare · Poland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Teva Poland operates as a pharmaceutical company specializing in generic and specialty medicines, positioning itself as a global leader in generic drug manufacturing. The website is professionally designed, targeting patients, healthcare professionals, and pharmacies in Poland. It offers comprehensive information about products, corporate responsibility, and patient support initiatives. The digital infrastructure leverages modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools, ensuring good performance and user experience across devices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and explicit policies could be enhanced. The absence of WHOIS data is due to registry privacy policies, which is common and justified for such enterprises. Overall, the website reflects a mature, trustworthy business presence with moderate tracking and compliance adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching teva.pl

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
88
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Teva Poland's market position as the world's largest generic drug manufacturer is reinforced by its extensive product catalog and corporate responsibility programs. The business model focuses on pharmaceutical manufacturing and distribution, serving a broad audience including patients and healthcare providers. The website's structured navigation and content indicate a well-established brand with consistent messaging. The use of third-party analytics and consent management tools suggests a commitment to data privacy and marketing effectiveness. No direct contact details were found in the analyzed content, indicating possible reliance on contact forms or other channels. The lack of visible certifications or security policies online suggests areas for transparency improvement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting baseline security and privacy compliance. However, no explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected in the provided data, and no published security or incident response policies were found. The use of reputable analytics and tracking services is balanced with user consent, indicating moderate privacy awareness. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced header configurations, published policies, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to strengthen trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize risks from outdated libraries.
  5. Enhance contact information availability, including verified company emails and phone numbers, to improve user trust and support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Teva
Description
Firma farmaceutyczna Teva - największy na świecie producent leków generycznych. Dostarczamy bezpieczne i skuteczne leki pacjentom na całym świecie.
Key services
generic medicines, specialty medicines, medical information services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Popper.js, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Allyable-Web accessibility script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • cookie consent mechanism
  • no exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Azure Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Azure Application Insights
Marketing tools
Microsoft Application Insights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Polish language
  2. No WHOIS data publicly available due to registry privacy policies
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in provided HTML snippet
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published
  6. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools with consent
  7. No signs of adult or inappropriate content
  8. Professional branding and consistent navigation structure
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Popper.js, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Application Insights for analytics and monitoring. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, ensuring GDPR compliance. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations such as Allyable-Web integration. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing script loading and reducing third-party dependencies. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional corporate website but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with teva.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review teva.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.