Skip to main content

Security report for termoauditi.lv

Sia VEK · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sia VEK operates as a specialized Latvian company providing thermography inspections, energy audits, and related training services. Positioned as a leading local provider, they emphasize expert commentary and certified personnel, including official distribution of FLIR infrared cameras. The website content supports their market position and service offerings, targeting building owners and professionals in the energy sector. Technically, the site uses legacy JavaScript libraries alongside Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, with basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate but lacks visible security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. No WHOIS data was retrievable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and informative but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching termoauditi.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention termoauditi.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for termoauditi.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong niche in the Latvian energy services market, focusing on thermography and energy audits. Their competitive advantage includes international certifications and official partnerships with FLIR. The business model centers on service delivery and training, with a small company size and localized market focus. Contact details and certifications enhance credibility, though the absence of privacy policies and modern web practices may limit trust with privacy-conscious clients. The partnership ecosystem is limited based on available data, with no evident subsidiaries or related domains. Growth potential exists through digital modernization and expanded compliance.

Security posture

Current security maturity is basic with no detected security headers and unknown SSL configuration. The site does not implement privacy or cookie policies, indicating GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Tracking via Google Analytics is active without visible consent mechanisms, posing privacy risks. The use of legacy JavaScript libraries may expose the site to vulnerabilities if not maintained. Overall, the security posture requires improvements in headers, encryption verification, privacy compliance, and incident readiness to reduce risk and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS certificates and verify configuration.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Modernize the website technology stack to replace legacy JavaScript libraries and improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sia VEK
Description
Sia VEK is a leading Latvian company specializing in thermography inspections and building energy audits. They provide reports with expert commentary and offer thermography training at all levels. They are official distributors of FLIR infrared cameras in Latvia and employ internationally certified thermography specialists.
Key services
Thermography inspections, Energy audits, Thermography training, Infrared camera distribution
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Prototype.js, Scriptaculous, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (urchin.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (urchin.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with company email and phone numbers.
  4. Use of older JavaScript libraries (Prototype.js, Scriptaculous) indicates legacy technology.
  5. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking with no visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML content; SSL status unknown.
  7. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML head.
  8. Business appears specialized in thermography and energy audits in Latvia.
  9. No social media links or physical addresses found in the content.
  10. No forms actively collecting user data on the main page; a commented-out calculator form is present but inactive.
Technical notes

Notes

The website relies on older JavaScript frameworks (Prototype.js, Scriptaculous) alongside Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking. The HTML structure is basic with multiple CSS files for styling but lacks modern responsive design elements. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization noted. SEO is basic with meta keywords and description but no structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal. The site would benefit from modernization to improve user experience, security, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with termoauditi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review termoauditi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.